Demon Erasers

This is the intellectual dishonesty that I'm talking about, and it's very, very simple.

It's not.

If you are all-knowing, like if I want to create the perfect car and I'm all-knowing, I don't have to experiment, right?

You're deflecting from the point that I'm making.

I'm literally talking about one issue and you're deflecting, okay?

And like I said, I'm not trying to be an ass, but this is my issue.

when they have discussions with the religious people because they deflect when you catch them on logical inconsistencies.

And this is a logical inconsistency.

And this is actually a very, very common logical inconsistencies that atheists will bring up to theists.

And what I'm saying is that you're telling me, from what I understand from you, is that the first round with angels was an experiment.

You literally said, well, you just said it wasn't what God wanted.

And that, to me, is why it becomes so frustrating.

Why do you judge God?

Who are you to say what God is or does or anything?

This is the Socratic method, and this is just looking at premise and seeing what logically follows from that.

So if God is this perfect being, if he's all-knowing, if he's all-loving, if he's all of these things, it does not follow that he would then create an experiment that was not perfect and have to try again.

God is all of it.

Well, then I'm asking you to please explain it to me, because what I'm telling, what I'm hearing from you, our premise that if I was writing them down on a piece of paper and I was using the Socratic method and I was saying, OK, well, this follows this, this follows this, this follows this, this follows this.

Hey, here's a logical inconsistency here.

Rather than trying to say that the logical inconsistency doesn't exist.