Dennis Eadie

From what I can remember, it was a case of someone saying the 999 and me answering it.

Well, obviously, yeah, yeah.

At every level of the criminal justice system, there's been a cover-up in this case.

And is there anyone from the CCRC here listening?

No.

Speaks volumes, doesn't it?

You don't recognise people on Zoom when you see them in real life.

If the original case that the jury looked at doesn't exist anymore, and it doesn't in this case, even people who think Jeremy's guilty would admit that, then surely you've got to have at least a retrial because there is no case anymore.

You can't rely on a jury that made a decision on a bunch of evidence which was completely fallacious.

I have my doubts, let's put it that way.

I'm the resident pessimist.

I suppose I've seen so many failures and so many cover-ups and things that...

I don't trust the system anymore.

You can't help thinking they're looking for a way not to refer it.

And you can't help thinking even if they did, the Court of Appeal would probably look for a way not to quash the conviction.

The Court of Appeal is notorious.

If it doesn't want to overturn a case, it will find a way.

It would be extremely embarrassing for Essex Police because they've resisted it to this day and they've failed to disclose stuff all along the line.

It would be extremely embarrassing for the CCRC.

It would be extremely embarrassing for the Court of Appeal who have turned the case down on at least two previous occasions and that's why it's so difficult now to believe that they are actually going to finally overturn the case.