Dennis McKenna

And we talked about, I mean, and he said, well, events like the first time an atomic bomb was ever detonated on the earth. That's a novel event. So that would be a spike. That would be a major marker to put down in this evolution of novelty or the first time an animal was cloned or various kinds of scientific discoveries. But I would say –

So he was sort of a proponent of the eruptive idea of novelty. Things burst into the continuum, you know, and are these novel events. And I advocated the idea that novelty kind of leaks into the continuum. It kind of oozes into the continuum. For example – You couldn't get to the atomic bomb.

So he was sort of a proponent of the eruptive idea of novelty. Things burst into the continuum, you know, and are these novel events. And I advocated the idea that novelty kind of leaks into the continuum. It kind of oozes into the continuum. For example – You couldn't get to the atomic bomb.

So he was sort of a proponent of the eruptive idea of novelty. Things burst into the continuum, you know, and are these novel events. And I advocated the idea that novelty kind of leaks into the continuum. It kind of oozes into the continuum. For example – You couldn't get to the atomic bomb.

Einstein had to have the idea first about E equals MC squared and then all these physicists came along and they developed nuclear reactions, controlled nuclear reactions, all of these things. These were novel events but they didn't get a lot of attention. But they created the foundation of new discoveries so that when the bomb finally exploded –

Einstein had to have the idea first about E equals MC squared and then all these physicists came along and they developed nuclear reactions, controlled nuclear reactions, all of these things. These were novel events but they didn't get a lot of attention. But they created the foundation of new discoveries so that when the bomb finally exploded –

Einstein had to have the idea first about E equals MC squared and then all these physicists came along and they developed nuclear reactions, controlled nuclear reactions, all of these things. These were novel events but they didn't get a lot of attention. But they created the foundation of new discoveries so that when the bomb finally exploded –

It was possible to develop that because the foundation of understanding was there. And those were novel discoveries, but they weren't dramatic in that way. Am I making sense here?

It was possible to develop that because the foundation of understanding was there. And those were novel discoveries, but they weren't dramatic in that way. Am I making sense here?

It was possible to develop that because the foundation of understanding was there. And those were novel discoveries, but they weren't dramatic in that way. Am I making sense here?

So novelty is there all the time.

So novelty is there all the time.

So novelty is there all the time.

Exactly. And this was – so Terrence – You know, he approached this. He was not a mathematician, although the time wave is a mathematical construct. He was not a statistician, which would have been useful, you know, to bring the theory to it. He was basically a historian. And his – so he was mapping with this time wave was his – view of history. And there are maps of the time wave.

Exactly. And this was – so Terrence – You know, he approached this. He was not a mathematician, although the time wave is a mathematical construct. He was not a statistician, which would have been useful, you know, to bring the theory to it. He was basically a historian. And his – so he was mapping with this time wave was his – view of history. And there are maps of the time wave.

Exactly. And this was – so Terrence – You know, he approached this. He was not a mathematician, although the time wave is a mathematical construct. He was not a statistician, which would have been useful, you know, to bring the theory to it. He was basically a historian. And his – so he was mapping with this time wave was his – view of history. And there are maps of the time wave.

I think they're reproduced in True Hallucinations. These huge maps and the idea that time is fractal, that every cycle is a reflection of... the supercycles and the subcycles so that you could see these historical resonances. And it's a fascinating idea. It is. And in some sense, it's true, but I don't think you can reduce it to –

I think they're reproduced in True Hallucinations. These huge maps and the idea that time is fractal, that every cycle is a reflection of... the supercycles and the subcycles so that you could see these historical resonances. And it's a fascinating idea. It is. And in some sense, it's true, but I don't think you can reduce it to –

I think they're reproduced in True Hallucinations. These huge maps and the idea that time is fractal, that every cycle is a reflection of... the supercycles and the subcycles so that you could see these historical resonances. And it's a fascinating idea. It is. And in some sense, it's true, but I don't think you can reduce it to –

A mathematical construct that you can, you know, I mean, people have put the time wave into software and you can run all sorts of programs and so on. But at the end of the day, it's Terence's view of history that's being mapped, you know.