Destiny
👤 PersonAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
Yeah, but the Eastman theory of what Pence could do in Congress is a far cry away. A truly shitty theory. I mean, make no mistake. But not just shitty. I think that if any Democrat had done this, I feel like we'd be looking at it in a far different lens.
Yeah, but the Eastman theory of what Pence could do in Congress is a far cry away. A truly shitty theory. I mean, make no mistake. But not just shitty. I think that if any Democrat had done this, I feel like we'd be looking at it in a far different lens.
Yeah, but the Eastman theory of what Pence could do in Congress is a far cry away. A truly shitty theory. I mean, make no mistake. But not just shitty. I think that if any Democrat had done this, I feel like we'd be looking at it in a far different lens.
As in we would be using terms like attempted coup, subversion of peaceful transfer of power if a Democrat vice president had tried to essentially say that in Congress they could throw away the vote.
As in we would be using terms like attempted coup, subversion of peaceful transfer of power if a Democrat vice president had tried to essentially say that in Congress they could throw away the vote.
As in we would be using terms like attempted coup, subversion of peaceful transfer of power if a Democrat vice president had tried to essentially say that in Congress they could throw away the vote.
We can dump the legal stuff, actually.
We can dump the legal stuff, actually.
We can dump the legal stuff, actually.
Because like you said, Jack Smith, nobody's charging with incitement. And I don't believe insurrection is a part of that. So we're dumping legal. Just in terms of like a president that is trying to prevent the peaceful transfer of power. So whether you call that a bloodless coup or a coup or whatever contemporaneous term you want to use.
Because like you said, Jack Smith, nobody's charging with incitement. And I don't believe insurrection is a part of that. So we're dumping legal. Just in terms of like a president that is trying to prevent the peaceful transfer of power. So whether you call that a bloodless coup or a coup or whatever contemporaneous term you want to use.
Because like you said, Jack Smith, nobody's charging with incitement. And I don't believe insurrection is a part of that. So we're dumping legal. Just in terms of like a president that is trying to prevent the peaceful transfer of power. So whether you call that a bloodless coup or a coup or whatever contemporaneous term you want to use.
Using means that are inappropriate or illegal.
Using means that are inappropriate or illegal.
Using means that are inappropriate or illegal.
I mean, inappropriate seems not— The reason I don't like the word inappropriate, though, is because then conservatives are very quick to say, well, sure, he was inappropriate, but everybody was inappropriate.
I mean, inappropriate seems not— The reason I don't like the word inappropriate, though, is because then conservatives are very quick to say, well, sure, he was inappropriate, but everybody was inappropriate.
I mean, inappropriate seems not— The reason I don't like the word inappropriate, though, is because then conservatives are very quick to say, well, sure, he was inappropriate, but everybody was inappropriate.
Okay. That's important to me, though. Does it not bother you that, like, Donald Trump sought through legal and extra-legal and Trump magical ways of trying to entrench his power as president past when he should have been able to? Is that not something that was incredibly troublesome?
Okay. That's important to me, though. Does it not bother you that, like, Donald Trump sought through legal and extra-legal and Trump magical ways of trying to entrench his power as president past when he should have been able to? Is that not something that was incredibly troublesome?