Destiny

Yeah, but keep him off the ballot. Why would the 14th Amendment stop if he thought Vice President Pence could unilaterally decide the outcome of the election?

I think we can kind of like laugh and say there's no scheme we could even concoct.

I think we can kind of like laugh and say there's no scheme we could even concoct.

I think we can kind of like laugh and say there's no scheme we could even concoct.

I think the issue, though, is that like the idea of electing another president that has tried to circumvent the peaceful transfer of power using extra legal means and then pretending like we can't concoct a single scheme that he could try to circumvent other legal processes to have a third term or to have a longer term or to install who he wants as the next president.

I think the issue, though, is that like the idea of electing another president that has tried to circumvent the peaceful transfer of power using extra legal means and then pretending like we can't concoct a single scheme that he could try to circumvent other legal processes to have a third term or to have a longer term or to install who he wants as the next president.

I think the issue, though, is that like the idea of electing another president that has tried to circumvent the peaceful transfer of power using extra legal means and then pretending like we can't concoct a single scheme that he could try to circumvent other legal processes to have a third term or to have a longer term or to install who he wants as the next president.

I just when a person has already shown you who they are and with every single person around him agrees with that. When every single person that's worked with him, save for the what, Sidney Powell, Eastman and Giuliani, which I don't think even I don't think anybody would want to throw their lot in with those three.

I just when a person has already shown you who they are and with every single person around him agrees with that. When every single person that's worked with him, save for the what, Sidney Powell, Eastman and Giuliani, which I don't think even I don't think anybody would want to throw their lot in with those three.

I just when a person has already shown you who they are and with every single person around him agrees with that. When every single person that's worked with him, save for the what, Sidney Powell, Eastman and Giuliani, which I don't think even I don't think anybody would want to throw their lot in with those three.

It just seems wild to me that we would say, like, yeah, we're just going to go in and trust this guy with another term of president. But like, he can't run for a third term. So it's fine when there's like 50 million other things.

It just seems wild to me that we would say, like, yeah, we're just going to go in and trust this guy with another term of president. But like, he can't run for a third term. So it's fine when there's like 50 million other things.

It just seems wild to me that we would say, like, yeah, we're just going to go in and trust this guy with another term of president. But like, he can't run for a third term. So it's fine when there's like 50 million other things.

Kind of, maybe, yeah. I don't know what makes things do this, but it feels like we can never have a good thing and then have it end as a good thing. Things always get taken to their extreme, and then we have to fight on those extremes. I would argue that back in my day, we called it SJW, Social Justice Warriors, before it became woke, and it's like 2013 onwards, whatever.

Kind of, maybe, yeah. I don't know what makes things do this, but it feels like we can never have a good thing and then have it end as a good thing. Things always get taken to their extreme, and then we have to fight on those extremes. I would argue that back in my day, we called it SJW, Social Justice Warriors, before it became woke, and it's like 2013 onwards, whatever.

Kind of, maybe, yeah. I don't know what makes things do this, but it feels like we can never have a good thing and then have it end as a good thing. Things always get taken to their extreme, and then we have to fight on those extremes. I would argue that back in my day, we called it SJW, Social Justice Warriors, before it became woke, and it's like 2013 onwards, whatever.

There are aspects to wokeism that I think are good. I like the additional representation that we have in media now. I like how, as much as people complain about the internet and how it's regulated, that there are way more groups that are represented on the internet, whether we're talking X, the platform formerly known as Twitter or Facebook or whatever.

There are aspects to wokeism that I think are good. I like the additional representation that we have in media now. I like how, as much as people complain about the internet and how it's regulated, that there are way more groups that are represented on the internet, whether we're talking X, the platform formerly known as Twitter or Facebook or whatever.

There are aspects to wokeism that I think are good. I like the additional representation that we have in media now. I like how, as much as people complain about the internet and how it's regulated, that there are way more groups that are represented on the internet, whether we're talking X, the platform formerly known as Twitter or Facebook or whatever.

I think in some ways, or whether we're pushing women's achievements in school and in the wider workforce, I think that these are all good things. The issue that you run into is people don't ever have a stopping point.