Dimitry Toukhcher

No, but drones typically hit targeted parties and things like weddings and all that kind of stuff.

That makes sense, yeah.

And drones are typically designed to conduct very accurate targeted strikes, and those tend to have people in them that are not combatants, right?

So we now know that there is a measure that defines war, and the average measure for war is nine civilians die for every single combatant killed.

So if you have a ratio of like 100 civilians per one combatant, I can make the case that's a genocide.

That's a very high ratio compared to, again, we have to compare it to what?

Compare it to what?

Yeah.

Even during the war that before the ceasefire was enacted in whatever form was enacted, the reported civilian to combatant ratio in Gaza was one to one.

Wow.

One to one.

It's a factor of 9x lower civilian death rate than the historically average number of civilian deaths in a war.

So the question I would ask is, these are accurate numbers.

Anybody can look them up.

Nobody's hiding this information.

It's just people are not aware of...

Comparing, right?

I mean, one of the maybe positive silver linings in this, and if there is such a thing, is that at least people are starting to understand how horrific and awful war is.

If you think Gaza is terrible because one civilian is dying for every combatant, imagine the average war where nine civilians are dying for every combatant.

Okay?