Dominique Foxworth

And that's why he needs someone.

And I'm sure he'll file a lawsuit.

I think Jeffrey Kessler, who's one of the best sports lawyers ever, is on his side.

And this process will get drawn out.

So I'm sure that's going to happen.

But the union, I think, should always be involved in situations like this.

What do you think that will do?

You're right.

It doesn't set a precedent, and I think it's hard to predict what this PA is going to do because the leadership changes, and it's been through a lot of tumult.

I was frustrated with them signing on with the legislation because that seemed like that hurt the players in college sports.

it's impossible to predict what this version of the players union will do.

And I think you're right.

It doesn't necessarily set a precedent that this will never happen again.

But I think in these cases, it does like the momentum matters because what's going to happen is next time there's a player in a situation like this, we're going to point back to this situation, which is what we did here was like, remember Terrell?

Like that's what we,

But Terrell Pryor, we were like, hey, he got a supplemental draft.

And then we used that as the reason or the way that we were going to talk about this, the reason why we thought this was a foregone conclusion, whether he was going to be suspended or not, which, again, I would say suspending a player for something that he did not or something that he committed.

infractionated committed at a previous place, I think is also unfair.

So that's my point is like, once you do things like that, maybe it's not like a legally binding precedent, but rather than starting from the middle or starting from your side, you're starting from a deficit where you're arguing, all right, the thing you did last time that we didn't disagree with,

It's OK.