Donald Trump
👤 PersonAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
Like you're so incompetent as a police chief that you can't enact if you say these reforms are necessary on your own. You need a federal monitor. The sort of more real politic explanation is that it allowed departments to go to the state and say, well, we need another $100 million of funding to comply with this policy. a federal monitored requirement and the consent decree.
Like you're so incompetent as a police chief that you can't enact if you say these reforms are necessary on your own. You need a federal monitor. The sort of more real politic explanation is that it allowed departments to go to the state and say, well, we need another $100 million of funding to comply with this policy. a federal monitored requirement and the consent decree.
Like you're so incompetent as a police chief that you can't enact if you say these reforms are necessary on your own. You need a federal monitor. The sort of more real politic explanation is that it allowed departments to go to the state and say, well, we need another $100 million of funding to comply with this policy. a federal monitored requirement and the consent decree.
So they saw it as kind of a way to leverage money. But a lot of that money just went into the care and feeding of these ridiculous monitors who were making millions of dollars a year. So this is going to be a big change in morale for the police to know that they can do their jobs go where crime is, go where people are being victimized.
So they saw it as kind of a way to leverage money. But a lot of that money just went into the care and feeding of these ridiculous monitors who were making millions of dollars a year. So this is going to be a big change in morale for the police to know that they can do their jobs go where crime is, go where people are being victimized.
So they saw it as kind of a way to leverage money. But a lot of that money just went into the care and feeding of these ridiculous monitors who were making millions of dollars a year. So this is going to be a big change in morale for the police to know that they can do their jobs go where crime is, go where people are being victimized.
Don't worry about who you're arresting and what the color is of the criminal, because the criminal doesn't give a damn about the color of his victim, more or less. Although let's also be honest here, if we're going to be our honesty hour, that the vast majority of interracial crime is disproportionately black on white, not white on black.
Don't worry about who you're arresting and what the color is of the criminal, because the criminal doesn't give a damn about the color of his victim, more or less. Although let's also be honest here, if we're going to be our honesty hour, that the vast majority of interracial crime is disproportionately black on white, not white on black.
Don't worry about who you're arresting and what the color is of the criminal, because the criminal doesn't give a damn about the color of his victim, more or less. Although let's also be honest here, if we're going to be our honesty hour, that the vast majority of interracial crime is disproportionately black on white, not white on black.
About 85% of all interracial violent crime is black on white rather than white on black. Nevertheless, the law enforcement system should be and is colorblind in going where people are being victimized, not based on the skin color of the perpetrators.
About 85% of all interracial violent crime is black on white rather than white on black. Nevertheless, the law enforcement system should be and is colorblind in going where people are being victimized, not based on the skin color of the perpetrators.
About 85% of all interracial violent crime is black on white rather than white on black. Nevertheless, the law enforcement system should be and is colorblind in going where people are being victimized, not based on the skin color of the perpetrators.
A different question. First of all, there were very few programs that actually had majors in DEI, but all it took was to major in women's studies or black studies or gender studies to find yourself qualified to be a diversity bureaucrat in a corporation. And the idea that these are highly specialized fields is absurd. There's no ease whatsoever. It is a total grip. Why?
A different question. First of all, there were very few programs that actually had majors in DEI, but all it took was to major in women's studies or black studies or gender studies to find yourself qualified to be a diversity bureaucrat in a corporation. And the idea that these are highly specialized fields is absurd. There's no ease whatsoever. It is a total grip. Why?
A different question. First of all, there were very few programs that actually had majors in DEI, but all it took was to major in women's studies or black studies or gender studies to find yourself qualified to be a diversity bureaucrat in a corporation. And the idea that these are highly specialized fields is absurd. There's no ease whatsoever. It is a total grip. Why?
In part, because there's no problem. You know, I hate this phrase that says, well, studies have shown that that DEI training doesn't work. I reject the entire premise of that because that presumes that there's a problem that DEI bureaucrats are supposed to solve. There is no problem. There is not systemic bias in corporations against females or minorities. The opposite is the case.
In part, because there's no problem. You know, I hate this phrase that says, well, studies have shown that that DEI training doesn't work. I reject the entire premise of that because that presumes that there's a problem that DEI bureaucrats are supposed to solve. There is no problem. There is not systemic bias in corporations against females or minorities. The opposite is the case.
In part, because there's no problem. You know, I hate this phrase that says, well, studies have shown that that DEI training doesn't work. I reject the entire premise of that because that presumes that there's a problem that DEI bureaucrats are supposed to solve. There is no problem. There is not systemic bias in corporations against females or minorities. The opposite is the case.
Females and minorities are being privileged at every possible opportunity. It's straight white males who are being disadvantaged by their race and sex and sexual preferences. So let's get that straight. There is nothing necessary here. Interestingly, though, you notice she slipped in that even in the corporate world, well, they're just being renamed.
Females and minorities are being privileged at every possible opportunity. It's straight white males who are being disadvantaged by their race and sex and sexual preferences. So let's get that straight. There is nothing necessary here. Interestingly, though, you notice she slipped in that even in the corporate world, well, they're just being renamed.