Donald Wan

I think it was Cam was on the floor, doe for a loose ball, grabbed it, found, I believe it was Isaiah Evans. And he just kind of very quickly lobbed it over the top because he was like, Pat's down there by himself. Everyone else is on the ground here with Cam. So all I got to do is just basically like hot potato this thing to Pat. And he has an easy basket. It's about finding those open guys and whether they were finding them.

ja meillä oli pari peliä, joissa oli yksi henkilö menemällä palkan päälle, ja päästiin toiseen henkilöön menemällä palkan päälle. Oli myös ping-pongi peli, jossa Slim kävi yhdellä puolella. Hän tappoi sen Patille, joka hienosti puhutti sen, mutta hän myös paitsi sen puolelle, koska hän tunneet, että se on tuotettu sinne. Ainoa henkilö oli Cam Boozer, ja Cam Boozer tappoi sen, ja hän laittoi sen.

Oletko puhunut Aliypille Malikille? No. Malikin ei pystynyt saamaan, vaan se oli toinen esimerkki siitä. Se oli toinen esimerkki, kyllä. Tämä oli yksi, jolloin tämä tapahtui, jolloin he olivat kohtuullisesti sopimassa. Mutta toisin sanoen, kyseessä oli, että kaverit, vaikka he olisivat menossa pöytään, olisivat edelleen nähneet näkemiinsä.

to look for guys and maybe say, hey, if I see two guys crashing on me, that means I can get the ball to this guy who's going to be wide open underneath the rim. And so I'd love to see the stats from the average two point distance for this game, because

Tarkoituksena, että teimme vain 10-3, se on varmasti hyvin vähäinen. Se on varmasti vähäinen numero, koska se tuntui niin, että kaikki, mitä teimme, oli rimmassa. Ja me teimme työtä, joita teimme aiemmin. Mielestäni se oli hienoa. Haluaisin puhua yhden henkilön erityisesti nyt. Se on Isaiah Evans, joka on 15 pointtia, 4 reboundtia, 2 assisteja ja stiiliä.

I think he only made one three. He only took two on the game. He must be tired because he took 14 the other day. If you average that out, it's like eight apiece. It's funny, the fact that he is evolving his game.

Olen varma, että Stamford oli varma, että hän aloittaa jättämään asioita ympäri arkkua, joten huomaa, kun hän on pysynyt. Hän oli varmasti ollut tilanteissa, joissa hän näyttäisi, että hän laittaisi kolman. Ja sitten hän oli saapunut ja hän oli rannassa ja hän yritti tehdä jotain Rimmasta, kuitenkaan se oli passi tai käynti. Haluan sitä, että hän on aloittanut, hän on todella yrittänyt kehittää tämän pelin viikkoja.

into more than just a three-point shooter. Sure, we're going to have those nights where that's what we need from him, and that's what the defense is going to play to him. But the fact that this time around he was like, no, I'm going to barely shoot threes, and I'm going to spend my time inside the paint because that's where the advantages are, I think is great. For him to see that and recognize it is a good thing. And also, again...

Amongst the trees, the fact that he's able to finish through contact and finish over guys, or in some cases dunk the life out of them, is a great feature to have for a guy who most people around the country know as that guy on Duke who only shoots threes.

Viimeinen asia, jota minulla on hyödyllistä, ovat nämä intangibles. Minä olen aina katsomassa nämä intangibles, koska joskus ne laittavat tarinan siitä, miten tämä peli on voinut. Ei välttämättä tämä peli, mutta se on edelleen mielenkiintoista nähdä, missä nämä intangibles näyttävät. Reboundeerimme. Reboundeerimme Stamfordista 35-29.

Points from turnovers, I think, was the story. Again, Duke Force, 18 turnovers, got 22 points off of those turnovers to just 6 from Stanford. In the paint, 44 to 20 was the advantage there. That's a difference of 24 points, and we won by 30, so you can see where a lot of that disparity came from. Second chance points, 17 to 11. Again, some of these intangibles can help paint details of close games, but even in a blowout like this, the fact that, again, you see that we were doing stuff through the paint,

Kuulemme, että olimme saavuttamassa tuntemuksia, koska olimme vahvistamassa paljon heitä, kunnossa olimme melko rauhallisia. Ja kuten sanoit, jos Stanfordi tuntui olevan mahdollista saavuttamaan tuntemuksia, he eivät. Stanfordin parhaimmat tuntemukset olivat vain viisi tuntemusta. Ja se oli toisen puolivuotiaan, kun olimme jo 30 tuntemuksen päällä.

Our biggest run was 10, but we had multiples of those throughout the game and we never trailed. So I like the fact that this team, you know, finally over the course of the last like six games in the ACC, had a game where they put both halves together. As you mentioned, they had a strong start, they never relented, and everything on offensive defense felt like it was clicking for the most part. And we were able to walk out of there with Cam Sheffield and Jack Scott

getting like four minutes of playing time because they were able to check in this game and really make an impact whenever they needed to and get that run that they deserve because we were able to kind of make this a complete game from start to finish.

Ja Maples paviljonissa eilen, olen sanonut, että telekastissa oli paljon vihreää, joten kiitos kaikille Duke-fansille, jotka olivat tuolla Lähiökohtaisessa. Tiedän, että he eivät saa paljon mahdollisuuksia nähdä meidän tiimimme pelaamista, joten se, että he olivat voineet nähdä kaupungissa, ja erityisesti Stanfordissa, oli hienoa, koska olin voinut tunnella se momentumi meille.

Any time we had a nice little run going, you could hear the Duke cheers in there. So for all of you out there, good on you for showing up and showing out for our Blue Devils. Let's take a quick break. On the other side, we're going to talk about a couple of things to improve from this game. We're obviously going to get to our debate about the play of the game, our player of the week also. So stick around. More from us on the DVR podcast.

Visit strongcoffeecompany.com and receive 20% off at checkout using promo code FFSN. Again, strongcoffeecompany.com, FFSN. All right, we are back. We shift our attention to things to improve in this game. And I will say the only thing... Again, I'm kind of nitpicking here with a couple of these things. The only thing is...

In the first half, we only made one three. We were one for six. It felt like at a time, and again, when you look back, you kind of go, Donald, you're crazy. It felt like we almost completely abandoned the three after, again, four or five games where we were

Almost exclusively relying on the three instead of our inside guys. And again, I like the fact that we were going inside. I think, again, I would love to see this team have a balanced attack, a balanced approach. You can't always get away with only shooting 10 threes.

In a game, especially in the ACC, we're going to have more games where we're going to have to shoot more threes just to, again, kind of balance out the attack when we have teams that have maybe a couple of guys that can contend with our bigs. But again, this is a very nitpicky thing. I would have loved to see us maybe shoot a couple more threes. We don't have to go overboard here, but maybe a little bit more of a balanced attack. Again, just to kind of prepare for those games down the road where we'll need it.