Dr. Abud Bakri

So there's controversy there.

Even if the FDA says, okay, we're okay with you prescribing it, is your medical board in that state going to be okay with it?

So it's state by state.

State by state loss.

The telehealth laws go into effect where the patient is.

So if, let's say in California, it's not allowed to have BPC according to the state board of pharmacy, whoever bans that,

Even if you're a New York doctor that's licensed in California, that would be against the California Medical Board, and they would ask you, if they found out, to stand in front of them.

Now, are boards cracking down on this?

Not really.

There's a couple of states that are cracking down on people, and people know to avoid those states.

But it's going to be very dicey over the next few years.

Okay.

No.

No, I think that story was hearsay.

I don't think they wanted to reveal what they actually did.

I don't think they only did BPC-157.

They'd be stupid if they did.

They should have, you know, all the best and latest, greatest treatments, whether exosomes, stem cells, other peptides.

And I mean, good luck proving that BPC was injected a week ago.

Because by the time, the peptide's already gone out of your system.