Dr. Andy Galpin

That's the context.

It's not the physiology or the biology that's mattering there.

It's now personal preference or objective data that says we're getting

less performance out of this is your recovery slowing down one of the cases.

So overall, I would say do what feels best for you there.

And there's not a significant thing you should be worried about the productivity you're leaving on the table, progress you're leaving on the table or compromised results from no matter what choice you make there, whether it is fats, the protein or the carbohydrates.

Yeah, so we actually ran this study.

We started in 2019, and we just published it this week.

That tells you, you know how that goes.

COVID killed us.

We had a big cohort study going.

Our last two groups, I was like literally days away from doing the final biopsies, and we got pulled out of the lab, and I was like begging our people.

I'm like, just let me one day go in and biopsy 10 people.

No, they wouldn't, so...

Nonetheless, we ran this study and one of the things we're interested in is with time restricted eating 16 to 8, all the research on that area for the most part is caloric restriction.

So how does this thing work for fat loss?

And that's fine.

Grant Tinsley, I don't know if you know Grant, but he's done a ton of work at Texas Tech and lots of other groups have done it.

You've talked a lot about TREs, 16 to 8, okay, great.

What I was more interested in is what's the opposite?