Dr. Bex
๐ค PersonAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
But at the same time, you're saying, but if they can eat, why are we doing it this way, right? I mean, like if they don't have a physiologic reason they can't eat, is it harmful to then not allow them to?
But at the same time, you're saying, but if they can eat, why are we doing it this way, right? I mean, like if they don't have a physiologic reason they can't eat, is it harmful to then not allow them to?
But at the same time, you're saying, but if they can eat, why are we doing it this way, right? I mean, like if they don't have a physiologic reason they can't eat, is it harmful to then not allow them to?
And so number four. So this is where we start getting into the question of Madison having the diagnosis of hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos, along with the other things we've spoken of. This one is now a violation of federal civil rights that they failed to provide adequate supervision, safety, security and health care to her.
And so number four. So this is where we start getting into the question of Madison having the diagnosis of hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos, along with the other things we've spoken of. This one is now a violation of federal civil rights that they failed to provide adequate supervision, safety, security and health care to her.
And so number four. So this is where we start getting into the question of Madison having the diagnosis of hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos, along with the other things we've spoken of. This one is now a violation of federal civil rights that they failed to provide adequate supervision, safety, security and health care to her.
And the idea that she was under the custody of the government at this time or under the custody of the County of San Diego. So now we're talking about the time from that shelter or detain order forward, which we don't have a lot of information about in the documentation.
And the idea that she was under the custody of the government at this time or under the custody of the County of San Diego. So now we're talking about the time from that shelter or detain order forward, which we don't have a lot of information about in the documentation.
And the idea that she was under the custody of the government at this time or under the custody of the County of San Diego. So now we're talking about the time from that shelter or detain order forward, which we don't have a lot of information about in the documentation.
But the idea that if the government has custody of a child, they owe them reasonable safety, minimally adequate care, and then also appropriate medical and mental health care, which I think should go without saying, but also it is stated. And I think...
But the idea that if the government has custody of a child, they owe them reasonable safety, minimally adequate care, and then also appropriate medical and mental health care, which I think should go without saying, but also it is stated. And I think...
But the idea that if the government has custody of a child, they owe them reasonable safety, minimally adequate care, and then also appropriate medical and mental health care, which I think should go without saying, but also it is stated. And I think...
We have talked about before when a child is in a hospital, I think that there've been times where they become less of an urgent priority to get them into placement elsewhere, like into a foster care situation, because a hospital is seen as a safe and healthy place for a child.
We have talked about before when a child is in a hospital, I think that there've been times where they become less of an urgent priority to get them into placement elsewhere, like into a foster care situation, because a hospital is seen as a safe and healthy place for a child.
We have talked about before when a child is in a hospital, I think that there've been times where they become less of an urgent priority to get them into placement elsewhere, like into a foster care situation, because a hospital is seen as a safe and healthy place for a child.
And so their argument is, I think that the defendants were aware of her true medical condition, which implying they list off, but hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos is at the top. And that they failed to investigate the actual cause, failed or refused to provide treatment. And then they do get into this use of unapproved and unauthorized hypnotic techniques to inject false memories.
And so their argument is, I think that the defendants were aware of her true medical condition, which implying they list off, but hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos is at the top. And that they failed to investigate the actual cause, failed or refused to provide treatment. And then they do get into this use of unapproved and unauthorized hypnotic techniques to inject false memories.
And so their argument is, I think that the defendants were aware of her true medical condition, which implying they list off, but hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos is at the top. And that they failed to investigate the actual cause, failed or refused to provide treatment. And then they do get into this use of unapproved and unauthorized hypnotic techniques to inject false memories.
So this plays into the whole sexual assault claims.
So this plays into the whole sexual assault claims.