Dr. Bex
speaker
498 appearances
7 recordings
1 series
first heard Nov 2024
last heard Jun 2025
Dr. Bex’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.
Trend
recordings per month · last 12 monthsNo recordings in the last 12 months.Older appearances are listed below; set an alert to hear about the next one.
Appearances
This is that due process doctrine. So the idea that you should be protected, your decision should be protected, and basically nothing should be able to come to you without due process. So meaning that you deserve due process before any of your rights are taken away. And so this is the parents' rights Really, I think their hub is this is the 14th Amendment.
And so all of that is used in this first claim regarding the video surveillance as it's an intrusion into a family association. It's an intrusion into, you know, a family's privacy. And then the idea that should that freedom be taken away without any due process. So like basically without the family being aware.
So the next claim is another violation of federal civil rights. And this one talks to the deception in the presentation of evidence and false reporting. So we did touch on this a little bit last time. But this concept of, you know, the wording in the lawsuit says that these defendants basically knowingly falsified child abuse reports, that there was knowingly false evidence and
and that this decision to remove the child was based on a juvenile court order, which the defendant fraudulently obtained, caused to be fraudulently obtained, or knew was fraudulently obtained. So again, the words false and fraudulent kind of continue to come up.
And then they even say it to the point of that these defendants acted, agreed, and or conspired to employ these tactics and then to continue to employ them basically to extend the I think the time that she was detained. And so I think I've said this probably 100 times on the podcast, this concept of conspiring in medicine.
When anyone who lives in the world of medicine knows that it is difficult to get three doctors to agree on a diagnosis, sometimes let alone get a group of doctors that would all be willing to conspire, quote unquote, against a family, I guess, as as some of these cases have claimed, that seems very far-fetched.
And that's because I work in this field and I cannot imagine walking around being like, hey guys, we should really, you know, do this and having everyone buy into it. It's just not how kind of things work. We all have our own set of, you know, principles. We all have our different specialty. We all have things we're coming in with previous experience.
And to me, the word knowingly, and I'm going to ask you kind of what you think after, but this idea of intentionality, right? That it was intentional, right? you knew you were lying and you lied, or you knew you were falsifying and you falsified. So to me, that is, I am looking at a lab result that says a child's hemoglobin is low, meaning his blood count is low or he has anemia.
And I knowingly look at my report and I'm like, well, patient's blood count was normal for age. Something that is so drastically, it is right in front of you and you are writing it a different way. To me, that is knowingly intentionally falsifying. The thing is, a lot of medicine is still subjective, meaning you can have three x-rays, 100 labs, and you're looking at everything.
And it's kind of how you, based on experience, based on knowledge, based on your specialty, how all that ties together into a diagnosis is not so objective all the time. And so I think, again, the way things are worded or the way someone interprets Information. That's why you have another side of the story. Right. It doesn't mean they're right or wrong.
It means that in their medical opinion, this is like how to interpret this data. And so I think it's that intentionality that I know they say because it makes it more a stronger case, I think. But what what are your thoughts?
And I think we put stuff into the medical record. We know that is forever discoverable, forever there. It is not hearsay. It is, you wrote the words. So again, I think we, I would hope most physicians are doing that with a I am not going to write something that I did not see with my own eyes.
It is something I know I heard and that usually someone also heard, like meaning a resident was with me and can also document that they heard it or a, you know, nurse was in the room. And when you say in quotes, you mean like mom says.
And again, I would only quote the part that they said. That is something that goes back to my training, but also I could see where that could be human error. So I think having another, you know, having someone else there and being able to say the same thing or also being able to document in a note what they heard, I think is useful. Because it is going to turn he said, she said at that point.
Yeah.
claim three for the unwarranted nonconsensual medical procedures and examinations. So we talked about this last time with that swallow study that we went into a little bit of detail about. And I think it also speaks to the covert video surveillance in the sense of if it was used for diagnosis of Munchausen by proxy, then it is a diagnostic procedure.
So then they should have been notified of it like any other diagnostic procedure. This seems like a little bit of a catch 22 to me because it's, if you're using it for the word diagnose, okay, then it is a diagnostic measure. So I see how it fits under, does it need consent or not?
I guess under that, what we were talking about last time, like would this hospital consider it a procedure that requires a consent or not? And then, but if you, See it as they were coming in with this covert surveillance to manufacture, I think was the word, evidence of abuse. Then was it for diagnosed? Right. I think it's kind of it's used a little bit in both ways.
And I think a swallow study, too, if the parents did refuse that, would that be something you would then go to a court order for, to be honest? Because, I mean, I'm thinking for me, myself as a physician, feeding through a G-tube is not...
I'm sorry, sometimes I have to tell a family, look, if that's the one thing they need to be safe and be healthy, big picture, it's a little procedure, you know, like you get a little tube. I can kind of say it that way in the sense of if they can still live their life and do everything else, then isn't that great?
Showing 121–140 of 498 · page 7 of 25
← Previous
Next →