Dr. Brian Keating

Maybe you win a golden medallion with Alfred Nobel's image on it or whatever. Those kinds of things are very powerful. And those kinds of things are also very dangerous, which is why it appeals to so many more people to think that the celestial orbs play a role in our lives.

Maybe you win a golden medallion with Alfred Nobel's image on it or whatever. Those kinds of things are very powerful. And those kinds of things are also very dangerous, which is why it appeals to so many more people to think that the celestial orbs play a role in our lives.

Maybe you win a golden medallion with Alfred Nobel's image on it or whatever. Those kinds of things are very powerful. And those kinds of things are also very dangerous, which is why it appeals to so many more people to think that the celestial orbs play a role in our lives.

It's almost like we've reverted to a paganistic existence where we want to believe there's some force responsible for our fates when maybe it's random.

It's almost like we've reverted to a paganistic existence where we want to believe there's some force responsible for our fates when maybe it's random.

It's almost like we've reverted to a paganistic existence where we want to believe there's some force responsible for our fates when maybe it's random.

Or what's a proprioception or our colleague when you were at San Diego, Ramachandra. Oh, Ramachandra. Yeah, like synesthesia, right?

Or what's a proprioception or our colleague when you were at San Diego, Ramachandra. Oh, Ramachandra. Yeah, like synesthesia, right?

Or what's a proprioception or our colleague when you were at San Diego, Ramachandra. Oh, Ramachandra. Yeah, like synesthesia, right?

Now, if that was useful for something, maybe it is useful.

Now, if that was useful for something, maybe it is useful.

Now, if that was useful for something, maybe it is useful.

But so could that not be made into an argument? Well, that means that this is a general feature that we just don't know how to access. But maybe like we could go to the gym and – mental gym or do something to enhance that like you said. I don't know. Some people do that with like infrared, near-infrared wavelengths that they – do some kind of training and they claim they can see certain things.

But so could that not be made into an argument? Well, that means that this is a general feature that we just don't know how to access. But maybe like we could go to the gym and – mental gym or do something to enhance that like you said. I don't know. Some people do that with like infrared, near-infrared wavelengths that they – do some kind of training and they claim they can see certain things.

But so could that not be made into an argument? Well, that means that this is a general feature that we just don't know how to access. But maybe like we could go to the gym and – mental gym or do something to enhance that like you said. I don't know. Some people do that with like infrared, near-infrared wavelengths that they – do some kind of training and they claim they can see certain things.

The question is, how useful is it? And then how predictive is it? And I don't think that we can make a case for the predictive elements of the position, as I said, of Mars and Mercury being in retrograde as it is now. But the thing that's shocking is that, look, there's a whole page in almost every newspaper except the excreble New York Times. No, I'm just kidding. The New York Times.

The question is, how useful is it? And then how predictive is it? And I don't think that we can make a case for the predictive elements of the position, as I said, of Mars and Mercury being in retrograde as it is now. But the thing that's shocking is that, look, there's a whole page in almost every newspaper except the excreble New York Times. No, I'm just kidding. The New York Times.

The question is, how useful is it? And then how predictive is it? And I don't think that we can make a case for the predictive elements of the position, as I said, of Mars and Mercury being in retrograde as it is now. But the thing that's shocking is that, look, there's a whole page in almost every newspaper except the excreble New York Times. No, I'm just kidding. The New York Times.

Are they still around? No. It's very interesting. I'll tell you off the air a recent encounter I've had with the New York Times. But most newspapers have more – hundreds of times more ink written about astrology than astronomy. I mean it's barely – it will barely be in there. And why is that? It's capitalistic society.

Are they still around? No. It's very interesting. I'll tell you off the air a recent encounter I've had with the New York Times. But most newspapers have more – hundreds of times more ink written about astrology than astronomy. I mean it's barely – it will barely be in there. And why is that? It's capitalistic society.