Dr. Dan Stickler
๐ค PersonAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
And when they actually looked at people who did it the right way with just sticking with the one drug, eating while they're taking it, which is hard to do because it's an appetite suppressant, but making themselves eat something and getting a good night's sleep especially that people didn't have to take supplements or anything like that, that they were just fine.
And when they actually looked at people who did it the right way with just sticking with the one drug, eating while they're taking it, which is hard to do because it's an appetite suppressant, but making themselves eat something and getting a good night's sleep especially that people didn't have to take supplements or anything like that, that they were just fine.
Yeah, we had a female executive. She was with a Fortune 500 company. And she was noticing that her edge was dropping off. She was around, I think, 52 years old. She had started losing her hormones, but she wasn't really being symptomatic. So her doctor said, you know, we're not going to put you on hormones if you're
Yeah, we had a female executive. She was with a Fortune 500 company. And she was noticing that her edge was dropping off. She was around, I think, 52 years old. She had started losing her hormones, but she wasn't really being symptomatic. So her doctor said, you know, we're not going to put you on hormones if you're
Yeah, we had a female executive. She was with a Fortune 500 company. And she was noticing that her edge was dropping off. She was around, I think, 52 years old. She had started losing her hormones, but she wasn't really being symptomatic. So her doctor said, you know, we're not going to put you on hormones if you're
you're not having any symptoms, that's going to increase your risk of breast cancer. and all of this. And this is one of the failures of evidence-based medicine. Evidence-based medicine has been valuable, but it's also reductionistic. And you can't treat a human in a reductionistic way because we're a complex adaptive system.
you're not having any symptoms, that's going to increase your risk of breast cancer. and all of this. And this is one of the failures of evidence-based medicine. Evidence-based medicine has been valuable, but it's also reductionistic. And you can't treat a human in a reductionistic way because we're a complex adaptive system.
you're not having any symptoms, that's going to increase your risk of breast cancer. and all of this. And this is one of the failures of evidence-based medicine. Evidence-based medicine has been valuable, but it's also reductionistic. And you can't treat a human in a reductionistic way because we're a complex adaptive system.
And the Women's Health Initiative truly set women's health back for the last 20 years by taking hormones away from women. And it resulted in there's going to be increase in dementia rates, quality of life just deteriorated over those 20 years that women were denied the hormones.
And the Women's Health Initiative truly set women's health back for the last 20 years by taking hormones away from women. And it resulted in there's going to be increase in dementia rates, quality of life just deteriorated over those 20 years that women were denied the hormones.
And the Women's Health Initiative truly set women's health back for the last 20 years by taking hormones away from women. And it resulted in there's going to be increase in dementia rates, quality of life just deteriorated over those 20 years that women were denied the hormones.
This was based on evidence-based medicine of the Women's Health Initiative and the sensational headlines that it created. Physicians were all buying into evidence-based medicine. That was the new medicine, you know, have the evidence of it. But it's reductionistic in the fact that it groups everybody into the population. And, you know, we saw this happen with the Women's Health Initiative.
This was based on evidence-based medicine of the Women's Health Initiative and the sensational headlines that it created. Physicians were all buying into evidence-based medicine. That was the new medicine, you know, have the evidence of it. But it's reductionistic in the fact that it groups everybody into the population. And, you know, we saw this happen with the Women's Health Initiative.
This was based on evidence-based medicine of the Women's Health Initiative and the sensational headlines that it created. Physicians were all buying into evidence-based medicine. That was the new medicine, you know, have the evidence of it. But it's reductionistic in the fact that it groups everybody into the population. And, you know, we saw this happen with the Women's Health Initiative.
We saw this happen with the low-fat craze of the 80s and 90s where everything was healthy as long as it didn't have fat. I mean, you know, sugar corn pops got the heart healthy label on it because it didn't have fat in it. And that resulted in a lot of metabolic disorders and cardiovascular disease because of that. But that was our evidence-based medicine approach.
We saw this happen with the low-fat craze of the 80s and 90s where everything was healthy as long as it didn't have fat. I mean, you know, sugar corn pops got the heart healthy label on it because it didn't have fat in it. And that resulted in a lot of metabolic disorders and cardiovascular disease because of that. But that was our evidence-based medicine approach.
We saw this happen with the low-fat craze of the 80s and 90s where everything was healthy as long as it didn't have fat. I mean, you know, sugar corn pops got the heart healthy label on it because it didn't have fat in it. And that resulted in a lot of metabolic disorders and cardiovascular disease because of that. But that was our evidence-based medicine approach.
The statin issues, even the opioid epidemic where pain became that symptom that had to be addressed and treated. rather than looking at individuals from an N of 1 basis. I mean, you can use the evidence-based medicine to guide what you look at with the individual, but you've got to look at the individual there.
The statin issues, even the opioid epidemic where pain became that symptom that had to be addressed and treated. rather than looking at individuals from an N of 1 basis. I mean, you can use the evidence-based medicine to guide what you look at with the individual, but you've got to look at the individual there.
The statin issues, even the opioid epidemic where pain became that symptom that had to be addressed and treated. rather than looking at individuals from an N of 1 basis. I mean, you can use the evidence-based medicine to guide what you look at with the individual, but you've got to look at the individual there.