Dr. Darryl Williams

And so if they can solve the errors, which we've already done, I believe you're going to see the whole autonomous sciences just blossom.

And so if they can solve the errors, which we've already done, I believe you're going to see the whole autonomous sciences just blossom.

Yeah, I think that I've seen many articles with Google and Meta and Amazon with the amount of money that they're spending. You're seeing open AI that is just increasing in value exponentially because there was no competitor. There was nothing else. So the fact that they weren't able to monetize their AI was irrelevant. They would just dump another 100 billion into it and hope for the best.

Yeah, I think that I've seen many articles with Google and Meta and Amazon with the amount of money that they're spending. You're seeing open AI that is just increasing in value exponentially because there was no competitor. There was nothing else. So the fact that they weren't able to monetize their AI was irrelevant. They would just dump another 100 billion into it and hope for the best.

Hope was the course of action. What DeepSeat did I mean, it used a different learning. It used this reinforced learning. But ultimately, it was still garbage in, garbage out. The accuracy is at 88%, same as OpenAI or whatever else. But what it is, the cost is much less. So now, all of a sudden, there is a replacement. Before it was them or else.

Hope was the course of action. What DeepSeat did I mean, it used a different learning. It used this reinforced learning. But ultimately, it was still garbage in, garbage out. The accuracy is at 88%, same as OpenAI or whatever else. But what it is, the cost is much less. So now, all of a sudden, there is a replacement. Before it was them or else.

Now you have this lower cost capability that because of its cost, you may be able to do some monetization. It shook the market. But ultimately, the market rebounded back just because it's the same thing. It's just a different name, but it's the same thing.

Now you have this lower cost capability that because of its cost, you may be able to do some monetization. It shook the market. But ultimately, the market rebounded back just because it's the same thing. It's just a different name, but it's the same thing.

Yeah, the trends, I mean, I live through the bubble, the internet bubble. I don't believe that... these valuations and capitalizations that we're seeing can continue at this level. I mean, because ultimately there is going to come a day of reckoning that it's not monetizable because the accuracy is so bad. And then what happens with that? Does that sour everybody in the AI?

Yeah, the trends, I mean, I live through the bubble, the internet bubble. I don't believe that... these valuations and capitalizations that we're seeing can continue at this level. I mean, because ultimately there is going to come a day of reckoning that it's not monetizable because the accuracy is so bad. And then what happens with that? Does that sour everybody in the AI?

And so for me, the one trend is the negative trend is to look at just What is the development to rectify that? It just seems like it's all the lemmings heading for the cliff. But on the flip side for my trend is I am looking at the, it's almost proportional with the amount of capitalization, with the amount of frustration and angst.

And so for me, the one trend is the negative trend is to look at just What is the development to rectify that? It just seems like it's all the lemmings heading for the cliff. But on the flip side for my trend is I am looking at the, it's almost proportional with the amount of capitalization, with the amount of frustration and angst.

What I'm looking at is as we are starting to permeate into those markets, we're starting to see more and more of the strategics, as we call them, start to have their awareness. but there is another solution. And that to me is the trend that I imagine seeing. You get enough strategics that are finally saying that what you're looking at over here is not reality. Look over here.

What I'm looking at is as we are starting to permeate into those markets, we're starting to see more and more of the strategics, as we call them, start to have their awareness. but there is another solution. And that to me is the trend that I imagine seeing. You get enough strategics that are finally saying that what you're looking at over here is not reality. Look over here.

At that point there, I think you're going to see a turn in the market. I like to say we're ready for that turn, but I don't think that any one of us can understand what kind of volume that's going to be when finally people get frustrated enough to turn.

At that point there, I think you're going to see a turn in the market. I like to say we're ready for that turn, but I don't think that any one of us can understand what kind of volume that's going to be when finally people get frustrated enough to turn.

I think we're already there. I think that two years ago, or even a year ago, the news item that permeated the airwaves was the rebirth of Terminator and PsyNet and everyone else, that AI was going in that direction. And so we're seeing that.

I think we're already there. I think that two years ago, or even a year ago, the news item that permeated the airwaves was the rebirth of Terminator and PsyNet and everyone else, that AI was going in that direction. And so we're seeing that.

My concern, as I've been talking with a lot of the senior leaders over in Europe, is the ethical implications of AI, where you have individuals which are saying, OK, so we have this capability. Ethically, do we pursue it?

My concern, as I've been talking with a lot of the senior leaders over in Europe, is the ethical implications of AI, where you have individuals which are saying, OK, so we have this capability. Ethically, do we pursue it?