Dr. Jay Bhattacharya
speaker
188 appearances
9 recordings
5 series
first heard Nov 2024
last heard 11 May
Dr. Jay Bhattacharya’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.
Trend
recordings per month · last 12 monthsRecordings per month over the last 12 months — 3 in all, peaking in Jan 2026 with 2.
Appearances
Yes, you're absolutely right, Senator. We don't need to address every idea or concern. But if those concerns result in parents not wanting to vaccinate their children for a vaccine that is well tested, my sense is that my inclination is to give people good data.
The money that comes to me, the direct costs as researchers, I understand exactly where that money goes. The indirect costs, I don't know where that goes. I think that that a lot of it likely goes to the things that are worthwhile. And I've heard lots of folks, including from Stanford who say that, um, And I agree with them.
Support for buildings, light bulbs to make sure that we can see in the lab, and a whole host of other important things. But there's a lot of distrust about where the money goes because the trust in the public health establishment has collapsed in the pandemic. I think transparency regarding indirect costs is absolutely worthwhile. And I want to make sure that the money goes to the research.
Yeah, I think there's this woman named Catherine Maher, I think is her name. She was the head of the Wikimedia Foundation, which was fundraising for Wikipedia. And then later, actually, she went over to NPR. She's like the CEO or something of NPR. Perfect. Her attitude toward the truth is absolutely shocking. Her basic idea is that there are many, many things that people disagree on.
If our goal is to find the truth, we're never going to be able to get things done. So what we really need is something else. Uh, and I mean, it's one thing for a scientist to have an attitude like that. They probably won't be very good scientists. Like they'll fail the scientists, like scientists, uh, succeed because they have a burning desire to know the truth.
They change their minds when they see new data or whatnot. It's another thing to have people who run our, uh, the main encyclopedia of human knowledge or a public radio station where essentially what she's arguing for is propaganda.
She's saying, look, we can show to you a facade that looks like the truth but isn't because it papers over the differences because we'll just exclude all the people that disagree. We'll slander all the people that disagree. I mean, I don't know if you've looked at My page in Wikipedia, it's pretty vandalized, and it's not anywhere close to an accurate representation of who I am or what I'm about.
If that's her version of what is true and what's false, like the importance of the truth, well, then, I mean, I don't want any part of it.
I mean, that book by Michael Sanger is really interesting. He wrote it quite early, actually. You know, in February of 2020, Tony Fauci sent his deputy, Cliff Lane, to go visit China. It was part of this WHO junket, essentially, to China that said, and the idea was like, let's go see what the Chinese did.
They came back home saying that what the Chinese did in January of 2020 with their draconian lockdowns had worked.
And there's this chilling email from Cliff Lane to Maria Vankirkov, the chief epidemiologist of the WHO, where it said, what the Chinese did worked, but albeit at great cost, it's going to take more than just the people in this room to decide if we want to do the same or something very close to that effect.
They were the top scientists, the top sort of public health officials of the world were absolutely fooled by the Chinese supposed conquering of COVID in 2020.
Okay, so this story is just, it's mind-boggling. I agree, it deserves more attention. HHS, commissioned a public relations firm named Force Marshberg in September of 2020, and then spent almost a billion dollars over the course of the Biden administration, essentially to propagandize the American public.
Their themes were very, the goal, the main goal was to tell people that if you don't get the COVID vaccine, you are unclean. And they fear-mongered about the risk to kids. They pushed forward false ideas about natural immunity where they said essentially denied its existence. They did everything they possibly could to –
tell you about the benefits of the vaccine, but never once told you about the potential harms, right? So for instance, the side effects of myocarditis for young men, as best I can tell, never came up once in any of their ads. And they put these ads into like the most vulnerable populations. It essentially was a billion dollars spent by the taxpayer to propagandize the American people.
Well, certainly if what the propaganda firm, the PR, sorry, PR firm did is- Well, no, no, no.
If a pharmaceutical company had put those ads out, then they would be liable by the FDA for violating the kind of advertising restrictions the FDA places on pharma. Like they would have, for instance, had to have told the public about the potential for side effects, right?
They couldn't have just promised things that were beneficial about the product without also telling the harms, potential harms, right? It's really shocking. Essentially, the U.S. government became, during the pandemic, especially during the Biden administration, the most gung-ho cheerleader for the pharma industry in the history of the pharma industry. They've never had a better salespeople.
That's right.
It does seem like the election has sort of broken some of the spell. I mean, it's not that it's gone, but it's still, I think it has lost some of its power. You know, I think it's the boy you called Cried Wolf. Like if you are screaming bloody murder And the thing that you're screaming about doesn't happen. People aren't going to believe you so much as easily anymore.
Showing 121–140 of 188 · page 7 of 10
← Previous
Next →