Dr. Jordan B. Peterson

Right, so I presume that these 1,400 are a subset of the 50,000 activists.

Right now. I'm curious about the 1,400 too, because you often see legacy media headline news that 1,400 scientists have signed some petitions. But then when you look into it, you know, it's often... I know the distinction between graduate student and, let's say, full-fledged scientist is murky. But part of the issue is always, well, exactly who were these 1,400 people, right?

Right now. I'm curious about the 1,400 too, because you often see legacy media headline news that 1,400 scientists have signed some petitions. But then when you look into it, you know, it's often... I know the distinction between graduate student and, let's say, full-fledged scientist is murky. But part of the issue is always, well, exactly who were these 1,400 people, right?

Right now. I'm curious about the 1,400 too, because you often see legacy media headline news that 1,400 scientists have signed some petitions. But then when you look into it, you know, it's often... I know the distinction between graduate student and, let's say, full-fledged scientist is murky. But part of the issue is always, well, exactly who were these 1,400 people, right?

And out from under which rocks did they climb? And so who were the 1,400? Like, roughly speaking, who were these people that-

And out from under which rocks did they climb? And so who were the 1,400? Like, roughly speaking, who were these people that-

And out from under which rocks did they climb? And so who were the 1,400? Like, roughly speaking, who were these people that-

Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah. I see. I see.

Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah. I see. I see.

Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah. I see. I see.

2022.

2022.

2022.

scientists publish their research findings and their reviews of the literature in scientific journals and it's one of the ways that the quality of these articles is vetted is by submitting the manuscripts before they're published to

scientists publish their research findings and their reviews of the literature in scientific journals and it's one of the ways that the quality of these articles is vetted is by submitting the manuscripts before they're published to

scientists publish their research findings and their reviews of the literature in scientific journals and it's one of the ways that the quality of these articles is vetted is by submitting the manuscripts before they're published to

Well, first of all, the editor reviews them to see if they're even vaguely possibly suitable for publication in that particular journal on the basis of, let's say, topic and quality and apparent integrity of research. Then they're sent out to experts in that area, multiple experts. for analysis, and that's part of the quality control process.

Well, first of all, the editor reviews them to see if they're even vaguely possibly suitable for publication in that particular journal on the basis of, let's say, topic and quality and apparent integrity of research. Then they're sent out to experts in that area, multiple experts. for analysis, and that's part of the quality control process.

Well, first of all, the editor reviews them to see if they're even vaguely possibly suitable for publication in that particular journal on the basis of, let's say, topic and quality and apparent integrity of research. Then they're sent out to experts in that area, multiple experts. for analysis, and that's part of the quality control process.

And that worked pretty well up until about 2015, I would say, or maybe even spectacularly well, all things considered. So that's the peer review process. What happened in this case was the reviews of this, the peer reviews of this particular article were of sufficient quality so that the editor decided that they might... Invite them as commentary. Right.