Dr. Jordan B. Peterson

And the worst trolls are two types. The atheistic reductionist materialists, they're Luciferian beyond belief. And every time I interview a scientist, the Simpsons comic book guys come out of the bloody, out from underneath their rocks and whine about how the fact that they're smart hasn't made them king of the world in their bitter and resentful troll demon world.

And the worst trolls are two types. The atheistic reductionist materialists, they're Luciferian beyond belief. And every time I interview a scientist, the Simpsons comic book guys come out of the bloody, out from underneath their rocks and whine about how the fact that they're smart hasn't made them king of the world in their bitter and resentful troll demon world.

epithets and the other ones are the christian fundamentalists and like they're equally intolerable you know peterson's almost there it's like well hey you know great glad you think so You know, what have you done lately?

epithets and the other ones are the christian fundamentalists and like they're equally intolerable you know peterson's almost there it's like well hey you know great glad you think so You know, what have you done lately?

epithets and the other ones are the christian fundamentalists and like they're equally intolerable you know peterson's almost there it's like well hey you know great glad you think so You know, what have you done lately?

You put your finger on something of crucial importance there with regards to the nature of both the real and belief. Like two plus two equals four doesn't demand anything of you. And that means it's not, it isn't a proposition that is translatable immediately into a value proposition, let's say. Not with regard to your own action. Well, things that are deeply true have implications for action.

You put your finger on something of crucial importance there with regards to the nature of both the real and belief. Like two plus two equals four doesn't demand anything of you. And that means it's not, it isn't a proposition that is translatable immediately into a value proposition, let's say. Not with regard to your own action. Well, things that are deeply true have implications for action.

You put your finger on something of crucial importance there with regards to the nature of both the real and belief. Like two plus two equals four doesn't demand anything of you. And that means it's not, it isn't a proposition that is translatable immediately into a value proposition, let's say. Not with regard to your own action. Well, things that are deeply true have implications for action.

This is something that I tried to lay out maps of meaning. There's a structure of perception that has to do with action. And that's a different form of It's a much different form of belief. It's even instantiated differently neurologically.

This is something that I tried to lay out maps of meaning. There's a structure of perception that has to do with action. And that's a different form of It's a much different form of belief. It's even instantiated differently neurologically.

This is something that I tried to lay out maps of meaning. There's a structure of perception that has to do with action. And that's a different form of It's a much different form of belief. It's even instantiated differently neurologically.

And so, but there's, we also have to understand for the religious types that are listening, especially the more literal minded religious types who are propositionalized beyond belief. The God in the Old Testament and the New, for that matter, is ineffable. He's beyond category. And so to say, is God real?

And so, but there's, we also have to understand for the religious types that are listening, especially the more literal minded religious types who are propositionalized beyond belief. The God in the Old Testament and the New, for that matter, is ineffable. He's beyond category. And so to say, is God real?

And so, but there's, we also have to understand for the religious types that are listening, especially the more literal minded religious types who are propositionalized beyond belief. The God in the Old Testament and the New, for that matter, is ineffable. He's beyond category. And so to say, is God real?

In some ways, it isn't a genuine question because God doesn't have the same order of reality as the profane things that are littered about us. The landscape, God isn't real the same way a table is real, right? And this is, I'm not inventing this up and out of whole cloth. There's an insistence that's continual.

In some ways, it isn't a genuine question because God doesn't have the same order of reality as the profane things that are littered about us. The landscape, God isn't real the same way a table is real, right? And this is, I'm not inventing this up and out of whole cloth. There's an insistence that's continual.

In some ways, it isn't a genuine question because God doesn't have the same order of reality as the profane things that are littered about us. The landscape, God isn't real the same way a table is real, right? And this is, I'm not inventing this up and out of whole cloth. There's an insistence that's continual.

And I think it's more definitive in the Old Testament accounts that whatever God is, is beyond categorization. right? This is why even Moses can only get a glimpse of God. So God is outside our category structures. Now, does that make him real? Well, I would say God is hyper real. God is the reality upon which all reality depends. That's a different kind of category.

And I think it's more definitive in the Old Testament accounts that whatever God is, is beyond categorization. right? This is why even Moses can only get a glimpse of God. So God is outside our category structures. Now, does that make him real? Well, I would say God is hyper real. God is the reality upon which all reality depends. That's a different kind of category.

And I think it's more definitive in the Old Testament accounts that whatever God is, is beyond categorization. right? This is why even Moses can only get a glimpse of God. So God is outside our category structures. Now, does that make him real? Well, I would say God is hyper real. God is the reality upon which all reality depends. That's a different kind of category.