Dr. Max Fomitchev-Zamilov

It blew a field transistor. So it will have to wait till next time. But that's, you know, the hypothesis. Und es scheint, der Pattern scheint sich zu formen. Nun, dieser Analyse ist sehr präliminär. Also, wenn wir über Forschung sprechen, sagt jeder, dass die Forschung peer-reviewed sein muss. Und das ist, was ich tue, indem ich es auf meinem Website poste.

It blew a field transistor. So it will have to wait till next time. But that's, you know, the hypothesis. Und es scheint, der Pattern scheint sich zu formen. Nun, dieser Analyse ist sehr präliminär. Also, wenn wir über Forschung sprechen, sagt jeder, dass die Forschung peer-reviewed sein muss. Und das ist, was ich tue, indem ich es auf meinem Website poste.

It blew a field transistor. So it will have to wait till next time. But that's, you know, the hypothesis. Und es scheint, der Pattern scheint sich zu formen. Nun, dieser Analyse ist sehr präliminär. Also, wenn wir über Forschung sprechen, sagt jeder, dass die Forschung peer-reviewed sein muss. Und das ist, was ich tue, indem ich es auf meinem Website poste.

Ich eröffne Kommentare und Kritik von meinen Peeren, von Leuten, die es verstehen. Glücklicherweise habe ich Freunde, die Geologie und Radioaktivität verstehen. Ein Freund meinte, dass ich noch ein Stück Software benötigen muss, um die Formanalysen und die Formkompensation zu machen, wenn man so will.

Ich eröffne Kommentare und Kritik von meinen Peeren, von Leuten, die es verstehen. Glücklicherweise habe ich Freunde, die Geologie und Radioaktivität verstehen. Ein Freund meinte, dass ich noch ein Stück Software benötigen muss, um die Formanalysen und die Formkompensation zu machen, wenn man so will.

Ich eröffne Kommentare und Kritik von meinen Peeren, von Leuten, die es verstehen. Glücklicherweise habe ich Freunde, die Geologie und Radioaktivität verstehen. Ein Freund meinte, dass ich noch ein Stück Software benötigen muss, um die Formanalysen und die Formkompensation zu machen, wenn man so will.

Denn er hat rechtzeitig bemerkt, dass man, wenn man Radioaktivität macht, und das ist genau das, was ich mache, ich zähle Gammas. The counts and the peaks will be affected by the geometry of the object that you are counting. So vase has this specific shape to it, whereas if I compare that to a rock, rock has a totally different shape.

Denn er hat rechtzeitig bemerkt, dass man, wenn man Radioaktivität macht, und das ist genau das, was ich mache, ich zähle Gammas. The counts and the peaks will be affected by the geometry of the object that you are counting. So vase has this specific shape to it, whereas if I compare that to a rock, rock has a totally different shape.

Denn er hat rechtzeitig bemerkt, dass man, wenn man Radioaktivität macht, und das ist genau das, was ich mache, ich zähle Gammas. The counts and the peaks will be affected by the geometry of the object that you are counting. So vase has this specific shape to it, whereas if I compare that to a rock, rock has a totally different shape.

So the software that I need is the one that accounts for the shape difference and is able to crunch through the spectrum and say, okay, well, I know what your shape was and I know how it was positioned with respect to the detector, so it does corrections and modifies the spectrum. So that's the step I need to do in order to say for sure, for sure the peaks are different.

So the software that I need is the one that accounts for the shape difference and is able to crunch through the spectrum and say, okay, well, I know what your shape was and I know how it was positioned with respect to the detector, so it does corrections and modifies the spectrum. So that's the step I need to do in order to say for sure, for sure the peaks are different.

So the software that I need is the one that accounts for the shape difference and is able to crunch through the spectrum and say, okay, well, I know what your shape was and I know how it was positioned with respect to the detector, so it does corrections and modifies the spectrum. So that's the step I need to do in order to say for sure, for sure the peaks are different.

So right now they appear to be different. And I think this is interesting because they appear to be different like on different objects. So the crudely made is consistent with the rock. The finely made is inconsistent with the rock. And because I've done it four times, It still could be chance, right? Sure.

So right now they appear to be different. And I think this is interesting because they appear to be different like on different objects. So the crudely made is consistent with the rock. The finely made is inconsistent with the rock. And because I've done it four times, It still could be chance, right? Sure.

So right now they appear to be different. And I think this is interesting because they appear to be different like on different objects. So the crudely made is consistent with the rock. The finely made is inconsistent with the rock. And because I've done it four times, It still could be chance, right? Sure.

But, you know, the more times you do it, the less chance it becomes if you get, you know, the consistent result. But I really need, you know, to get that software in order to crunch the numbers to remove this objection.

But, you know, the more times you do it, the less chance it becomes if you get, you know, the consistent result. But I really need, you know, to get that software in order to crunch the numbers to remove this objection.

But, you know, the more times you do it, the less chance it becomes if you get, you know, the consistent result. But I really need, you know, to get that software in order to crunch the numbers to remove this objection.

Nein, es wird es nicht mehr radioaktiv machen.

Nein, es wird es nicht mehr radioaktiv machen.