Dr. Max Fomitchev-Zamilov

Because supernova events are recorded in... As I said, there is a bunch of scientific literature on the topic, and it's not a controversial topic. We know that cosmic events occur, and we know they change the radiocarbon balance in atmosphere. I didn't know that the rocks are impacted. That was new information. But if the rocks are impacted, then yeah.

Because supernova events are recorded in... As I said, there is a bunch of scientific literature on the topic, and it's not a controversial topic. We know that cosmic events occur, and we know they change the radiocarbon balance in atmosphere. I didn't know that the rocks are impacted. That was new information. But if the rocks are impacted, then yeah.

Or let's say you go to a Sirion, right? It's made out of granite. And if you can detect these cosmic events on the walls, you can say, well, it's got to be a lot older than what we're said.

Or let's say you go to a Sirion, right? It's made out of granite. And if you can detect these cosmic events on the walls, you can say, well, it's got to be a lot older than what we're said.

Or let's say you go to a Sirion, right? It's made out of granite. And if you can detect these cosmic events on the walls, you can say, well, it's got to be a lot older than what we're said.

You've got to remind me about that too, because I forgot to look into it. I forgot the term.

You've got to remind me about that too, because I forgot to look into it. I forgot the term.

You've got to remind me about that too, because I forgot to look into it. I forgot the term.

Yeah, that would be amazing if we learned how to date. Even just granite. That could answer already a lot of questions.

Yeah, that would be amazing if we learned how to date. Even just granite. That could answer already a lot of questions.

Yeah, that would be amazing if we learned how to date. Even just granite. That could answer already a lot of questions.

Well, I have two thoughts on this question. And I'm glad you asked the question again because I remembered something. So first of all, we primarily use chemical energy right now. Gas, diesel, natural gases, you know, chemical energy. And we do use a great deal of nuclear energy also for power generation, power plants, aircraft carriers, you know, things like that.

Well, I have two thoughts on this question. And I'm glad you asked the question again because I remembered something. So first of all, we primarily use chemical energy right now. Gas, diesel, natural gases, you know, chemical energy. And we do use a great deal of nuclear energy also for power generation, power plants, aircraft carriers, you know, things like that.

Well, I have two thoughts on this question. And I'm glad you asked the question again because I remembered something. So first of all, we primarily use chemical energy right now. Gas, diesel, natural gases, you know, chemical energy. And we do use a great deal of nuclear energy also for power generation, power plants, aircraft carriers, you know, things like that.

And the more civilization becomes power-hungry, I think it's unavoidable. We're going to resort more and more to nuclear energy. And that's why right now there is this fusion craze. Because I think wrongfully conventional nuclear energy has been deemed bad. I don't agree with that at all. But regardless...

And the more civilization becomes power-hungry, I think it's unavoidable. We're going to resort more and more to nuclear energy. And that's why right now there is this fusion craze. Because I think wrongfully conventional nuclear energy has been deemed bad. I don't agree with that at all. But regardless...

And the more civilization becomes power-hungry, I think it's unavoidable. We're going to resort more and more to nuclear energy. And that's why right now there is this fusion craze. Because I think wrongfully conventional nuclear energy has been deemed bad. I don't agree with that at all. But regardless...

The reason everybody in scientific community believes that the nuclear energy is our future is because there is a million times more energy density per volume or per unit of mass in, let's say, nuclear power than in chemical power. And if you have a civilization that's anywhere higher than we are, that's what they ought to be using. Or something even more advanced that we cannot even think of.

The reason everybody in scientific community believes that the nuclear energy is our future is because there is a million times more energy density per volume or per unit of mass in, let's say, nuclear power than in chemical power. And if you have a civilization that's anywhere higher than we are, that's what they ought to be using. Or something even more advanced that we cannot even think of.

The reason everybody in scientific community believes that the nuclear energy is our future is because there is a million times more energy density per volume or per unit of mass in, let's say, nuclear power than in chemical power. And if you have a civilization that's anywhere higher than we are, that's what they ought to be using. Or something even more advanced that we cannot even think of.