Dr. Peter McCullough
๐ค SpeakerAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
But everybody that says, well, why do surgeons wear masks then? Yes, so bacteria doesn't spill into a sterile abdominal cavity or chest cavity. Yes, that's what it's for. Or hair nets, so bacteria on the hair doesn't fall into the surgical field. Not for viruses. We're not trying to protect the anesthesiologist from the surgeon's virus. The patient is on a ventilator, right, during surgery?
But everybody that says, well, why do surgeons wear masks then? Yes, so bacteria doesn't spill into a sterile abdominal cavity or chest cavity. Yes, that's what it's for. Or hair nets, so bacteria on the hair doesn't fall into the surgical field. Not for viruses. We're not trying to protect the anesthesiologist from the surgeon's virus. The patient is on a ventilator, right, during surgery?
Anyway, it's just so nutty that people have all these strong opinions about it. People need to not have opinions about the practice of medicine anymore. It's driving me a little crazy. friend Kat Timp publicly announced her recent delivery of her cute baby boy, whom we met last night, and that she has a diagnosis of breast cancer at CIN zero, essentially. Stage zero, CIN stage zero. And it's good.
Anyway, it's just so nutty that people have all these strong opinions about it. People need to not have opinions about the practice of medicine anymore. It's driving me a little crazy. friend Kat Timp publicly announced her recent delivery of her cute baby boy, whom we met last night, and that she has a diagnosis of breast cancer at CIN zero, essentially. Stage zero, CIN stage zero. And it's good.
That's good. And she has been thinking about some aggressive treatments for a long time because her mother had severe advanced cancer at a young age and whatnot, and is gonna get this taken care of and things are gonna be fine. I really do believe it now having seen the data. But nobody should have an opinion about what she's doing in response to her condition.
That's good. And she has been thinking about some aggressive treatments for a long time because her mother had severe advanced cancer at a young age and whatnot, and is gonna get this taken care of and things are gonna be fine. I really do believe it now having seen the data. But nobody should have an opinion about what she's doing in response to her condition.
That should be between she and her doctor with the input of her family. That's it, period, end of story. You should be concerned about your ethical standing if you have an opinion. And I love the way people always talk about, you can make a diagnosis about somebody's Parkinson's disease just by looking at them. Like, yeah, no, you can't.
That should be between she and her doctor with the input of her family. That's it, period, end of story. You should be concerned about your ethical standing if you have an opinion. And I love the way people always talk about, you can make a diagnosis about somebody's Parkinson's disease just by looking at them. Like, yeah, no, you can't.
There's certain things you can look at a video of and you can have a very, very accurate opinion about. But having an opinion about what somebody chooses to do for a treatment in a complicated situation of a given individual, a given family system, a given history, given whatever other conditions that individual has that you don't know about, you should have no opinion about it.
There's certain things you can look at a video of and you can have a very, very accurate opinion about. But having an opinion about what somebody chooses to do for a treatment in a complicated situation of a given individual, a given family system, a given history, given whatever other conditions that individual has that you don't know about, you should have no opinion about it.
Not unless that person wants to come in and talk to you about it and talk about it publicly, then it's fine. All right, let me just look quickly at what you guys are saying here on the restream, and then we'll wrap this thing up. While I'm doing so, Caleb, do you want to throw up upcoming guests there? Yeah, the Gene Hackman story is really bizarre, isn't it?
Not unless that person wants to come in and talk to you about it and talk about it publicly, then it's fine. All right, let me just look quickly at what you guys are saying here on the restream, and then we'll wrap this thing up. While I'm doing so, Caleb, do you want to throw up upcoming guests there? Yeah, the Gene Hackman story is really bizarre, isn't it?
Caleb, do you have any thoughts about Gary Sneaks on March 19th? Do you have any thoughts about that?
Caleb, do you have any thoughts about Gary Sneaks on March 19th? Do you have any thoughts about that?
The strangest part is that the dog died too. And then there was another dog that was fine.
The strangest part is that the dog died too. And then there was another dog that was fine.
I didn't know that. It's weird. Well, here's what it smacks of. It smacks of... He was 95 years old. It smacks of the caretaker dying of something and leaving the elderly person exposed, and he eventually dies. And maybe the dog died of something, starvation or something also, or no water available. It smacks of that. While I know they're treating it as a suspicious event, because it is, it is...
I didn't know that. It's weird. Well, here's what it smacks of. It smacks of... He was 95 years old. It smacks of the caretaker dying of something and leaving the elderly person exposed, and he eventually dies. And maybe the dog died of something, starvation or something also, or no water available. It smacks of that. While I know they're treating it as a suspicious event, because it is, it is...
It kind of smacks of somebody who was responsible for somebody dying and then the person dying eventually. It's sad, it's terrible, but I'm glad they're looking into it. It looks odd. Had there not been a dog, I would have been certain that's what had happened. But the dog adds an interesting to the whole thing, question mark. All right, I'm looking at your guys on the ramp.
It kind of smacks of somebody who was responsible for somebody dying and then the person dying eventually. It's sad, it's terrible, but I'm glad they're looking into it. It looks odd. Had there not been a dog, I would have been certain that's what had happened. But the dog adds an interesting to the whole thing, question mark. All right, I'm looking at your guys on the ramp.