Dr. Peter McCullough

So let's say I had a... takes kind of an on-the-fence case, a 55-year-old female who's obese with diabetes. What if I were to go, you have to take the Moderna, you have to take the Moderna? That is not informed consent. I would have to go, look, the Novavax provides spike protein. It does have some of the same side effects as the Moderna and the Pfizer. Moderna is higher concentration, more virus.

So let's say I had a... takes kind of an on-the-fence case, a 55-year-old female who's obese with diabetes. What if I were to go, you have to take the Moderna, you have to take the Moderna? That is not informed consent. I would have to go, look, the Novavax provides spike protein. It does have some of the same side effects as the Moderna and the Pfizer. Moderna is higher concentration, more virus.

You've

You've

It turns your body into a spike. I mean, we'd have to sit down for 10 minutes and talk about the risk benefits of each of these vaccines. And yet what people get is, take that, take the vaccine. It's just so crazy to me. And Francis Collins, as you mentioned a few minutes ago, that the public health... that it has been, did not help these things. Lisa Murray, we're talking about Novavax.

It turns your body into a spike. I mean, we'd have to sit down for 10 minutes and talk about the risk benefits of each of these vaccines. And yet what people get is, take that, take the vaccine. It's just so crazy to me. And Francis Collins, as you mentioned a few minutes ago, that the public health... that it has been, did not help these things. Lisa Murray, we're talking about Novavax.

That's one of the things we're suggesting. But that they didn't take risk-reward into account at all. And Francis Collins is on the record saying that they did not consider. To me, that is a... Malpractice doesn't begin to sort of incorporate what I think of doctors that don't take risk-reward into analysis. I remember when I was training internists That was sort of my number uno issue.

That's one of the things we're suggesting. But that they didn't take risk-reward into account at all. And Francis Collins is on the record saying that they did not consider. To me, that is a... Malpractice doesn't begin to sort of incorporate what I think of doctors that don't take risk-reward into analysis. I remember when I was training internists That was sort of my number uno issue.

Like, you know, why are you making these choices? What are the risks and benefits? And what's your backup plan? And never, we just have to do something, ever, ever, ever. That was the worst thing I ever heard from young physicians. I had to do something. It's how you harm people. But they had to do this uber alice.

Like, you know, why are you making these choices? What are the risks and benefits? And what's your backup plan? And never, we just have to do something, ever, ever, ever. That was the worst thing I ever heard from young physicians. I had to do something. It's how you harm people. But they had to do this uber alice.

They had to stop this virus, no matter what destruction they brought, and they brought it. And then now the same thing, question is in my mind as it pertains to the vaccine. Why pushing so hard on these two When there are at least two other alternatives, and certainly Novavax has been around, is it still around? I heard some rumor that it might come off.

They had to stop this virus, no matter what destruction they brought, and they brought it. And then now the same thing, question is in my mind as it pertains to the vaccine. Why pushing so hard on these two When there are at least two other alternatives, and certainly Novavax has been around, is it still around? I heard some rumor that it might come off.

No, it's still around. So just quickly on the safety rundown, I think there's enough papers to make these conclusions. The most dangerous was Moderna, the original ones, which had 100 micrograms of messenger RNA. Then next was Pfizer at 30 micrograms of messenger RNA. The Janssen vaccine came in third. Now that presented special risks.

No, it's still around. So just quickly on the safety rundown, I think there's enough papers to make these conclusions. The most dangerous was Moderna, the original ones, which had 100 micrograms of messenger RNA. Then next was Pfizer at 30 micrograms of messenger RNA. The Janssen vaccine came in third. Now that presented special risks.

It's nearly identical to the AstraZeneca vaccine used elsewhere. And the risks were more thrombotic blood clots. And then the safest vaccine was always Novavax in the United States. And as you pointed out, Covishield or the inactivated vaccines used elsewhere. Now, Senator Rand Paul broke the news, Dr. Drew, of why Pfizer and Moderna is preferentially promoted by public health agencies.

It's nearly identical to the AstraZeneca vaccine used elsewhere. And the risks were more thrombotic blood clots. And then the safest vaccine was always Novavax in the United States. And as you pointed out, Covishield or the inactivated vaccines used elsewhere. Now, Senator Rand Paul broke the news, Dr. Drew, of why Pfizer and Moderna is preferentially promoted by public health agencies.

And it is, by the way. Our DHS- advertises it. Actually, our government does Pfizer's commercials for them on TV. It's because Pfizer Moderna used the same PR firm, Weber Shandwick. And Weber Shandwick has an installed vaccine promotional unit within the CDC center in Atlanta. And Rand Paul found out about this and wrote Rochelle Lewinsky and said, what is this? You can't have

And it is, by the way. Our DHS- advertises it. Actually, our government does Pfizer's commercials for them on TV. It's because Pfizer Moderna used the same PR firm, Weber Shandwick. And Weber Shandwick has an installed vaccine promotional unit within the CDC center in Atlanta. And Rand Paul found out about this and wrote Rochelle Lewinsky and said, what is this? You can't have

in a sense, a biopharmaceutical promotion unit within a government agency. And that's exactly what's gone on. So our CDC has wrongfully presented just two possibilities and not fairly described the entire formula.

in a sense, a biopharmaceutical promotion unit within a government agency. And that's exactly what's gone on. So our CDC has wrongfully presented just two possibilities and not fairly described the entire formula.