Dr. Roger Sur

We know that TURBT procedure is critical in the care of patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. With data that shows that CIS was missed by TURBT in more than 45% of radical cystectomy cases and 86% of residual tumors have been found at the original resection site, it's clear that enhanced visualization could be a significant benefit during TURBT's.

We know that TURBT procedure is critical in the care of patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. With data that shows that CIS was missed by TURBT in more than 45% of radical cystectomy cases and 86% of residual tumors have been found at the original resection site, it's clear that enhanced visualization could be a significant benefit during TURBT's.

We know that TURBT procedure is critical in the care of patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. With data that shows that CIS was missed by TURBT in more than 45% of radical cystectomy cases and 86% of residual tumors have been found at the original resection site, it's clear that enhanced visualization could be a significant benefit during TURBT's.

Further, with only 23% of patients coming back for re-resection, it's all the more important to do a complete TURBT right from the start.

Further, with only 23% of patients coming back for re-resection, it's all the more important to do a complete TURBT right from the start.

Further, with only 23% of patients coming back for re-resection, it's all the more important to do a complete TURBT right from the start.

This week on the Backtable Podcast. Isn't a stone a three-dimensional object? Shouldn't we be looking at volume of stone? You think about it, it totally makes sense. It's the volume of the stone that probably makes a lot more sense than the two-dimensional. It's kind of dumbing it down when really we should be looking at volume. So that I think is one of the futures is to look at

This week on the Backtable Podcast. Isn't a stone a three-dimensional object? Shouldn't we be looking at volume of stone? You think about it, it totally makes sense. It's the volume of the stone that probably makes a lot more sense than the two-dimensional. It's kind of dumbing it down when really we should be looking at volume. So that I think is one of the futures is to look at

This week on the Backtable Podcast. Isn't a stone a three-dimensional object? Shouldn't we be looking at volume of stone? You think about it, it totally makes sense. It's the volume of the stone that probably makes a lot more sense than the two-dimensional. It's kind of dumbing it down when really we should be looking at volume. So that I think is one of the futures is to look at

How much stone are you leaving behind? And not just in two dimensions, but in three dimensions. You can see there's emerging research demonstrating the importance of volume. So I think when you're gonna see that more and more, that people will be talking about how much volume is left behind and how that translates to all those things that you were talking about, post-op problems.

How much stone are you leaving behind? And not just in two dimensions, but in three dimensions. You can see there's emerging research demonstrating the importance of volume. So I think when you're gonna see that more and more, that people will be talking about how much volume is left behind and how that translates to all those things that you were talking about, post-op problems.

How much stone are you leaving behind? And not just in two dimensions, but in three dimensions. You can see there's emerging research demonstrating the importance of volume. So I think when you're gonna see that more and more, that people will be talking about how much volume is left behind and how that translates to all those things that you were talking about, post-op problems.

It's going great, Aditya. I'm really honored to be here. And I'm glad you're my host, actually, because it makes it super comfortable for me since we're good friends.

It's going great, Aditya. I'm really honored to be here. And I'm glad you're my host, actually, because it makes it super comfortable for me since we're good friends.

It's going great, Aditya. I'm really honored to be here. And I'm glad you're my host, actually, because it makes it super comfortable for me since we're good friends.

I thought maybe step back and give broad perspective to all of our audience because we've got some, you know, young people that are still in training. We have people recently out of training. We have people like yourself and myself that are, I guess, maybe mid-career working towards senior careers. And then there are people who've been around for quite some time.

I thought maybe step back and give broad perspective to all of our audience because we've got some, you know, young people that are still in training. We have people recently out of training. We have people like yourself and myself that are, I guess, maybe mid-career working towards senior careers. And then there are people who've been around for quite some time.

I thought maybe step back and give broad perspective to all of our audience because we've got some, you know, young people that are still in training. We have people recently out of training. We have people like yourself and myself that are, I guess, maybe mid-career working towards senior careers. And then there are people who've been around for quite some time.

If we roll back the clock to the 70s and beyond, it was open surgery was phenomenal. you know, state of the art and really was the standard of care. But then somewhere in the 70s, three major players came in was the introduction of percutaneous stone surgery going through the back.

If we roll back the clock to the 70s and beyond, it was open surgery was phenomenal. you know, state of the art and really was the standard of care. But then somewhere in the 70s, three major players came in was the introduction of percutaneous stone surgery going through the back.