Dr. Theresa Bullard

Don't make the universe a great machine. But that is exactly what they ended up doing. So I think that if we hadn't gone in that direction, if we had gone in the direction that Newton originally intended, you know, we would probably be very much ahead.

Don't make the universe a great machine. But that is exactly what they ended up doing. So I think that if we hadn't gone in that direction, if we had gone in the direction that Newton originally intended, you know, we would probably be very much ahead.

And, you know, in a way, I see that there was an alchemy within science itself, you know, because the alchemical formula is to separate, purify and recombine. And so it's almost like science had to go through its own phase of separation to to really hone its craft and purify the way it operates.

And, you know, in a way, I see that there was an alchemy within science itself, you know, because the alchemical formula is to separate, purify and recombine. And so it's almost like science had to go through its own phase of separation to to really hone its craft and purify the way it operates.

And, you know, in a way, I see that there was an alchemy within science itself, you know, because the alchemical formula is to separate, purify and recombine. And so it's almost like science had to go through its own phase of separation to to really hone its craft and purify the way it operates.

But now we're coming into this age where we need to recombine again and bring the spirit back to the physics. So for me, when I was in physics, it was like, Okay, our knowledge is advancing, our technology is advancing, and it's going to start... We're now in this exponential curve of rapid advancement that's happening.

But now we're coming into this age where we need to recombine again and bring the spirit back to the physics. So for me, when I was in physics, it was like, Okay, our knowledge is advancing, our technology is advancing, and it's going to start... We're now in this exponential curve of rapid advancement that's happening.

But now we're coming into this age where we need to recombine again and bring the spirit back to the physics. So for me, when I was in physics, it was like, Okay, our knowledge is advancing, our technology is advancing, and it's going to start... We're now in this exponential curve of rapid advancement that's happening.

Within just five years from now, the world's going to be completely different than it is today, just based on science and technology. But unfortunately, our wisdom wasn't keeping pace with the advancement of the science and the knowledge, and therefore...

Within just five years from now, the world's going to be completely different than it is today, just based on science and technology. But unfortunately, our wisdom wasn't keeping pace with the advancement of the science and the knowledge, and therefore...

Within just five years from now, the world's going to be completely different than it is today, just based on science and technology. But unfortunately, our wisdom wasn't keeping pace with the advancement of the science and the knowledge, and therefore...

the way in which humanity is choosing to apply the knowledge and the power and the tools that we have available to us isn't necessarily towards the greatest good. And so I felt like it was more important for humanity to tap back into wisdom

the way in which humanity is choosing to apply the knowledge and the power and the tools that we have available to us isn't necessarily towards the greatest good. And so I felt like it was more important for humanity to tap back into wisdom

the way in which humanity is choosing to apply the knowledge and the power and the tools that we have available to us isn't necessarily towards the greatest good. And so I felt like it was more important for humanity to tap back into wisdom

in order to bring the two together so that the wisdom could guide the scientific applications, that we can take these tools and technologies and this knowledge and power and apply it towards a greater good versus just the good of a few. Mm-hmm.

in order to bring the two together so that the wisdom could guide the scientific applications, that we can take these tools and technologies and this knowledge and power and apply it towards a greater good versus just the good of a few. Mm-hmm.

in order to bring the two together so that the wisdom could guide the scientific applications, that we can take these tools and technologies and this knowledge and power and apply it towards a greater good versus just the good of a few. Mm-hmm.

Sure. So the first one is determinism. It basically says that if we were given an initial set of conditions, we should be able to predetermine, based on the laws of science, all future evolution or all future progression of that initial state, right? So it's deterministic. Therefore, we can predict it. We can control it. We should be able to know what's going to happen next.

Sure. So the first one is determinism. It basically says that if we were given an initial set of conditions, we should be able to predetermine, based on the laws of science, all future evolution or all future progression of that initial state, right? So it's deterministic. Therefore, we can predict it. We can control it. We should be able to know what's going to happen next.

Sure. So the first one is determinism. It basically says that if we were given an initial set of conditions, we should be able to predetermine, based on the laws of science, all future evolution or all future progression of that initial state, right? So it's deterministic. Therefore, we can predict it. We can control it. We should be able to know what's going to happen next.