Dr. Tristan Engels

This isn't the first time that Charles has faced rejection in the music industry, and it hasn't derailed him so far. But Dennis rejecting him, I imagine, did not go over well, especially if that rejection was witnessed by his family. Part of why he's so successful in maintaining their loyalty and devotion is he continues to maintain an image that doesn't appear questioned by anyone.

This isn't the first time that Charles has faced rejection in the music industry, and it hasn't derailed him so far. But Dennis rejecting him, I imagine, did not go over well, especially if that rejection was witnessed by his family. Part of why he's so successful in maintaining their loyalty and devotion is he continues to maintain an image that doesn't appear questioned by anyone.

This isn't the first time that Charles has faced rejection in the music industry, and it hasn't derailed him so far. But Dennis rejecting him, I imagine, did not go over well, especially if that rejection was witnessed by his family. Part of why he's so successful in maintaining their loyalty and devotion is he continues to maintain an image that doesn't appear questioned by anyone.

Now you have an influential musician who seemingly has a fresh perspective of Charles and his family and how demanding he can be. And if he was going to be reactive to his rejection, it was likely because of the fear that Dennis's feelings about him might influence his family and fracture everything he's built. In addition to obvious, the grandiose dreams of becoming a big musician.

Now you have an influential musician who seemingly has a fresh perspective of Charles and his family and how demanding he can be. And if he was going to be reactive to his rejection, it was likely because of the fear that Dennis's feelings about him might influence his family and fracture everything he's built. In addition to obvious, the grandiose dreams of becoming a big musician.

Now you have an influential musician who seemingly has a fresh perspective of Charles and his family and how demanding he can be. And if he was going to be reactive to his rejection, it was likely because of the fear that Dennis's feelings about him might influence his family and fracture everything he's built. In addition to obvious, the grandiose dreams of becoming a big musician.

Now you have an influential musician who... seemingly has a fresh perspective of Charles and his family and how demanding he can be. And if he was going to be reactive to his rejection, it was likely because of the fear that Dennis' feelings about him might influence his family and fracture everything he's built. In addition to obvious, the grandiose dreams of becoming a big musician,

Now you have an influential musician who... seemingly has a fresh perspective of Charles and his family and how demanding he can be. And if he was going to be reactive to his rejection, it was likely because of the fear that Dennis' feelings about him might influence his family and fracture everything he's built. In addition to obvious, the grandiose dreams of becoming a big musician,

Now you have an influential musician who... seemingly has a fresh perspective of Charles and his family and how demanding he can be. And if he was going to be reactive to his rejection, it was likely because of the fear that Dennis' feelings about him might influence his family and fracture everything he's built. In addition to obvious, the grandiose dreams of becoming a big musician,

I don't think someone like Charles is capable of introspection or accountability. In fact, I don't think he's aware that anything he is doing is wrong. In situations like this, I would expect Charles to get angered and project that anger onto the rejecter. He responds with violence.

I don't think someone like Charles is capable of introspection or accountability. In fact, I don't think he's aware that anything he is doing is wrong. In situations like this, I would expect Charles to get angered and project that anger onto the rejecter. He responds with violence.

I don't think someone like Charles is capable of introspection or accountability. In fact, I don't think he's aware that anything he is doing is wrong. In situations like this, I would expect Charles to get angered and project that anger onto the rejecter. He responds with violence.

I don't think someone like Charles is capable of introspection or accountability. In fact, I don't think he's aware that anything he is doing is wrong. In situations like this, I would expect Charles to get angered and project that anger onto the rejecter. He responds with violence.

I don't think someone like Charles is capable of introspection or accountability. In fact, I don't think he's aware that anything he is doing is wrong. In situations like this, I would expect Charles to get angered and project that anger onto the rejecter. He responds with violence.

I don't think someone like Charles is capable of introspection or accountability. In fact, I don't think he's aware that anything he is doing is wrong. In situations like this, I would expect Charles to get angered and project that anger onto the rejecter. He responds with violence.

It's a coercive tactic that he's used to maintain obedience and avoidance conditioning, meaning that he reacts like this with individuals because they're less likely to do whatever it was in the first place that caused that reaction. So he's conditioning them to avoid questioning him, to avoid rejecting him.

It's a coercive tactic that he's used to maintain obedience and avoidance conditioning, meaning that he reacts like this with individuals because they're less likely to do whatever it was in the first place that caused that reaction. So he's conditioning them to avoid questioning him, to avoid rejecting him.

It's a coercive tactic that he's used to maintain obedience and avoidance conditioning, meaning that he reacts like this with individuals because they're less likely to do whatever it was in the first place that caused that reaction. So he's conditioning them to avoid questioning him, to avoid rejecting him.

It's a coercive tactic that he's used to maintain obedience and avoidance conditioning, meaning that he reacts like this with individuals because they're less likely to do whatever it was in the first place that caused that reaction. So he's conditioning them to avoid questioning him, to avoid rejecting him.

It's a coercive tactic that he's used to maintain obedience and avoidance conditioning, meaning that he reacts like this with individuals because they're less likely to do whatever it was in the first place that caused that reaction. So he's conditioning them to avoid questioning him, to avoid rejecting him.