Dr. Vin Gupta

But the fact that they're even saying that, and I mean, Ben, they're putting that

in the physical exam that they think he has bilateral bruising up the back of his hands because he shakes a lot of people's hands and it's a secondary complication of being on high-dose aspirin.

They're putting the explanation and they're editorializing in the physical exam report.

That's not normal.

You don't do that.

You don't put AI cardiac age to justify somebody being 14 years younger than their chronologic age in a physical exam.

That's editorializing.

That's providing your own opinion in something that should be an objective statement based on what you're seeing during your examination.

Number one, in terms of what we should be seeing in this case is what is a normal physical exam of the president and what's the normal readout here without the editorialization?

We cannot trust anything in my view that this medical team puts out because when they put it out on a Friday night, three days after he actually got the exam, why the delay?

Why a Friday night?

They didn't want to bring attention to it.

Fine.

That's obvious.

Friday night, hoping that it's going to escape scrutiny.

Two, why the editorialization?

Three, why didn't they know, going back to our initial discussion on this back many, many months ago, that he got evidently a CT instead of an MRI of his torso.

His own docs had to be corrected then by the patient himself, the president of this case.

That makes no sense.

It makes me wonder if the president actually even trusts his doctors to put out a statement that won't cause more questions than reassurance, hence the Friday night report.