Dylan Mangel

Yeah, and that's actually, it makes sense, right? Even if some of that nematode blew in there over the years from close by fields, it didn't really have anything to really increase numbers. You know, by nature of soil sampling, we're probing, we might miss the odd random nematode there, but that makes complete sense that that's a new field. And we actually run into that problem with research.

Yeah, and that's actually, it makes sense, right? Even if some of that nematode blew in there over the years from close by fields, it didn't really have anything to really increase numbers. You know, by nature of soil sampling, we're probing, we might miss the odd random nematode there, but that makes complete sense that that's a new field. And we actually run into that problem with research.

Yeah, and that's actually, it makes sense, right? Even if some of that nematode blew in there over the years from close by fields, it didn't really have anything to really increase numbers. You know, by nature of soil sampling, we're probing, we might miss the odd random nematode there, but that makes complete sense that that's a new field. And we actually run into that problem with research.

We go out and we try to find some areas that have no nematodes at this point. And we have to go to these new fields or corn on corn fields and work with that. And I'll also say your corn on corn field. with the history of that was your second lowest one that you had out of that group of fields as well.

We go out and we try to find some areas that have no nematodes at this point. And we have to go to these new fields or corn on corn fields and work with that. And I'll also say your corn on corn field. with the history of that was your second lowest one that you had out of that group of fields as well.

We go out and we try to find some areas that have no nematodes at this point. And we have to go to these new fields or corn on corn fields and work with that. And I'll also say your corn on corn field. with the history of that was your second lowest one that you had out of that group of fields as well.

And that's a big one. I think we've also seen soybean yields not keep up with the progression that corn yields have made in the last several years. But that could actually just be that soybean cyst nematode is building up in these fields across our country, and that's holding those yields back. So, yeah, it's probably a mix of things, but the cysts are actually definitely playing a role.

And that's a big one. I think we've also seen soybean yields not keep up with the progression that corn yields have made in the last several years. But that could actually just be that soybean cyst nematode is building up in these fields across our country, and that's holding those yields back. So, yeah, it's probably a mix of things, but the cysts are actually definitely playing a role.

And that's a big one. I think we've also seen soybean yields not keep up with the progression that corn yields have made in the last several years. But that could actually just be that soybean cyst nematode is building up in these fields across our country, and that's holding those yields back. So, yeah, it's probably a mix of things, but the cysts are actually definitely playing a role.

Yeah. Two of the biggest predictors that we've observed are sand content in that soil and soil pH percentage. Those increase the nematodes do a little bit better. So that can drive yield loss based on those levels. So the higher the pH, the more.

Yeah. Two of the biggest predictors that we've observed are sand content in that soil and soil pH percentage. Those increase the nematodes do a little bit better. So that can drive yield loss based on those levels. So the higher the pH, the more.

Yeah. Two of the biggest predictors that we've observed are sand content in that soil and soil pH percentage. Those increase the nematodes do a little bit better. So that can drive yield loss based on those levels. So the higher the pH, the more.

Well, I think in the short-term future, I think the most exciting thing is peaking the resistance source is making it into really good genetic backgrounds. It's been around for a while. When 88788 started to fail, peaking showed up on the scene.

Well, I think in the short-term future, I think the most exciting thing is peaking the resistance source is making it into really good genetic backgrounds. It's been around for a while. When 88788 started to fail, peaking showed up on the scene.

Well, I think in the short-term future, I think the most exciting thing is peaking the resistance source is making it into really good genetic backgrounds. It's been around for a while. When 88788 started to fail, peaking showed up on the scene.

But for breeding, it takes a good decade to get good changes, and now we're getting that resistance source and really good backgrounds, and we've just seen it doing really well in variety trials.

But for breeding, it takes a good decade to get good changes, and now we're getting that resistance source and really good backgrounds, and we've just seen it doing really well in variety trials.

But for breeding, it takes a good decade to get good changes, and now we're getting that resistance source and really good backgrounds, and we've just seen it doing really well in variety trials.

That's the short-term excitement, but even with that, PI-887-88 is still effective, and we need to keep rotating those, if nothing else, but to save peaking from breaking in the same way that PI-887-88 did. There's potential traits coming out for soybean cyst nematode in the future. But again, these things take time. So we might not see any of that for who knows how long.

That's the short-term excitement, but even with that, PI-887-88 is still effective, and we need to keep rotating those, if nothing else, but to save peaking from breaking in the same way that PI-887-88 did. There's potential traits coming out for soybean cyst nematode in the future. But again, these things take time. So we might not see any of that for who knows how long.