Ed Helms

And then we've got 25 minutes.

I also love that.

And this is I'm delighted to be sort of plugging your podcast in this moment, too, because it is so funny.

And the premise you I think you told me like a few minutes into the podcast, you're like, oh, yeah.

And by the way, we have to agree with the caller.

Like we have to take the caller's side in this whole thing.

We try to no matter what be on their team so they're our friend.

And what I love about that and what is so Jake to me about that is how ludicrously arbitrary that is.

It's like this is just a – this will make things interesting.

This will mess things up.

This will just – this will keep everyone off balance.

This will make –

This will make everyone have to like condition their answer in such a ridiculous way that you can't rely on your tricks and your tools and whatever your instincts.

It's like, no, no, no.

We're going to take – we're just going to make this arbitrary rule.

And it just makes – like that by itself makes me laugh.

Well, because if you were if you were allowed to disagree, then a lot of us would come on and go, no, let me tell you how it should be.

Sure.

And I'm like, but if they're driving the train and all we're doing, if they're the star player on the team and it's our job to make sure they win.

Then you go like, their logic's crazy, but I have to be with them.