Ed Martin (intro by Charlie Kirk)

At all. Right, exactly. Back to weaponization. The 51 guys that signed the letter on the Hunter Biden laptop, you'd have to be a fool to think that's an isolated incident. In other words, if they're willing to misuse and mischaracterize a letter based on their status and the advantage that they have as insiders, that's not the only time they did it. No, exactly.

At all. Right, exactly. Back to weaponization. The 51 guys that signed the letter on the Hunter Biden laptop, you'd have to be a fool to think that's an isolated incident. In other words, if they're willing to misuse and mischaracterize a letter based on their status and the advantage that they have as insiders, that's not the only time they did it. No, exactly.

And so the question is, how endemic is the weaponization? Right. And we both know the answer. This is back to your point. It's much, much worse than we think. The question is, how do we continually go about getting to the bottom of it? I'll probably get myself in trouble. You intro. Who knows? One of the ways I ran elections.

And so the question is, how endemic is the weaponization? Right. And we both know the answer. This is back to your point. It's much, much worse than we think. The question is, how do we continually go about getting to the bottom of it? I'll probably get myself in trouble. You intro. Who knows? One of the ways I ran elections.

And so the question is, how endemic is the weaponization? Right. And we both know the answer. This is back to your point. It's much, much worse than we think. The question is, how do we continually go about getting to the bottom of it? I'll probably get myself in trouble. You intro. Who knows? One of the ways I ran elections.

One of the places I think that is really problematic that nobody has looked at is the certification of systems. Right. Certification of election systems. Right. For the record, not saying there's any fraud. But how do you certify?

One of the places I think that is really problematic that nobody has looked at is the certification of systems. Right. Certification of election systems. Right. For the record, not saying there's any fraud. But how do you certify?

One of the places I think that is really problematic that nobody has looked at is the certification of systems. Right. Certification of election systems. Right. For the record, not saying there's any fraud. But how do you certify?

Well, I know, but the election. Look at what's at stake. Exactly. Well, no, no, but even better. Look at how much money it is. That's what I'm saying. Right. Well, okay. But even just the Election Assistance Commission is the entity that certifies machines. Okay.

Well, I know, but the election. Look at what's at stake. Exactly. Well, no, no, but even better. Look at how much money it is. That's what I'm saying. Right. Well, okay. But even just the Election Assistance Commission is the entity that certifies machines. Okay.

Well, I know, but the election. Look at what's at stake. Exactly. Well, no, no, but even better. Look at how much money it is. That's what I'm saying. Right. Well, okay. But even just the Election Assistance Commission is the entity that certifies machines. Okay.

It has no real teeth, but it controls who's certified or not, which means it controls who has the good housekeeping stamp of approval worth hundreds and hundreds of millions of dollars. What are the chances that that has been done? Everything else we've seen in government is broken, corrupt, messy, incompetent or something. Right.

It has no real teeth, but it controls who's certified or not, which means it controls who has the good housekeeping stamp of approval worth hundreds and hundreds of millions of dollars. What are the chances that that has been done? Everything else we've seen in government is broken, corrupt, messy, incompetent or something. Right.

It has no real teeth, but it controls who's certified or not, which means it controls who has the good housekeeping stamp of approval worth hundreds and hundreds of millions of dollars. What are the chances that that has been done? Everything else we've seen in government is broken, corrupt, messy, incompetent or something. Right.

What are the chances that's the one place where it's totally competent and totally without any flaws? I'm just saying, let's go look. Right. And that's what we've got to do to get to the bottom of this.

What are the chances that's the one place where it's totally competent and totally without any flaws? I'm just saying, let's go look. Right. And that's what we've got to do to get to the bottom of this.

What are the chances that's the one place where it's totally competent and totally without any flaws? I'm just saying, let's go look. Right. And that's what we've got to do to get to the bottom of this.

I love when you do this Tucker move. It's weird. It's weird only if you impute good intentions to these people. It is weird then. No, you're right. It's totally predictable. I mean, and all around the world, by the way, they're watching this happening. Poland right now, they're in the midst of, they're trying to take Poland out. Obama is in Poland. There's an election in a week. Of course.

I love when you do this Tucker move. It's weird. It's weird only if you impute good intentions to these people. It is weird then. No, you're right. It's totally predictable. I mean, and all around the world, by the way, they're watching this happening. Poland right now, they're in the midst of, they're trying to take Poland out. Obama is in Poland. There's an election in a week. Of course.

I love when you do this Tucker move. It's weird. It's weird only if you impute good intentions to these people. It is weird then. No, you're right. It's totally predictable. I mean, and all around the world, by the way, they're watching this happening. Poland right now, they're in the midst of, they're trying to take Poland out. Obama is in Poland. There's an election in a week. Of course.