Ed Martin (intro by Charlie Kirk)

A month later, Kavanaugh's got somebody in front of his house with a gun and zip ties. So you can say, well, what are we doing here? My letter to Schumer was clarify what you're saying, because if you're saying I think you deserve to clarify. And I wanted the public to know I was asking.

And by the way, Schumer did clarify on the floor of the Senate and he backed off and he apologized and all the rest. And he probably didn't. Oh, he didn't, in my estimation, commit a crime. That's why I didn't charge him. But the fact is we have to have public conversations about these horrendous things.

And by the way, Schumer did clarify on the floor of the Senate and he backed off and he apologized and all the rest. And he probably didn't. Oh, he didn't, in my estimation, commit a crime. That's why I didn't charge him. But the fact is we have to have public conversations about these horrendous things.

And by the way, Schumer did clarify on the floor of the Senate and he backed off and he apologized and all the rest. And he probably didn't. Oh, he didn't, in my estimation, commit a crime. That's why I didn't charge him. But the fact is we have to have public conversations about these horrendous things.

DEI, Georgetown University School of Law, someone came to me and they said they're still pushing the DEI stuff. Georgetown, by the way, the silly dean wrote me back and he said, oh, First Amendment, First Amendment. I didn't say he couldn't do it. Do whatever you want, but don't take federal tax dollars.

DEI, Georgetown University School of Law, someone came to me and they said they're still pushing the DEI stuff. Georgetown, by the way, the silly dean wrote me back and he said, oh, First Amendment, First Amendment. I didn't say he couldn't do it. Do whatever you want, but don't take federal tax dollars.

DEI, Georgetown University School of Law, someone came to me and they said they're still pushing the DEI stuff. Georgetown, by the way, the silly dean wrote me back and he said, oh, First Amendment, First Amendment. I didn't say he couldn't do it. Do whatever you want, but don't take federal tax dollars.

If you're going to put it publicly out there that you're doing DEI and doing hate, just like if you're doing anti-Semitism, we're going to say we're not going to send tax dollars your way and we don't have to. So that's what the letters were about. I tell people it's like an iceberg. You're seeing the top third. About two thirds of it was below. Nobody's seen most of the letters I wrote.

If you're going to put it publicly out there that you're doing DEI and doing hate, just like if you're doing anti-Semitism, we're going to say we're not going to send tax dollars your way and we don't have to. So that's what the letters were about. I tell people it's like an iceberg. You're seeing the top third. About two thirds of it was below. Nobody's seen most of the letters I wrote.

If you're going to put it publicly out there that you're doing DEI and doing hate, just like if you're doing anti-Semitism, we're going to say we're not going to send tax dollars your way and we don't have to. So that's what the letters were about. I tell people it's like an iceberg. You're seeing the top third. About two thirds of it was below. Nobody's seen most of the letters I wrote.

As to the Biden letters about the pardon, the question was about the pardons. And to be fair, it wasn't about the auto pen necessarily. It was about we've never seen pardons of the scope. And it looks at least like something that you could be corrupt.

As to the Biden letters about the pardon, the question was about the pardons. And to be fair, it wasn't about the auto pen necessarily. It was about we've never seen pardons of the scope. And it looks at least like something that you could be corrupt.

As to the Biden letters about the pardon, the question was about the pardons. And to be fair, it wasn't about the auto pen necessarily. It was about we've never seen pardons of the scope. And it looks at least like something that you could be corrupt.

When Bill Clinton pardoned Mark Rich and it turns out that Mark Rich had paid a boatload of money to one of Clinton's friends, the lawyers, that's not corrupt. It's not criminal because the plenary power of the pardon. But in the case of Joe Biden and his pardons, they were so specific. Back 14 years, covering everything you've ever done.

When Bill Clinton pardoned Mark Rich and it turns out that Mark Rich had paid a boatload of money to one of Clinton's friends, the lawyers, that's not corrupt. It's not criminal because the plenary power of the pardon. But in the case of Joe Biden and his pardons, they were so specific. Back 14 years, covering everything you've ever done.

When Bill Clinton pardoned Mark Rich and it turns out that Mark Rich had paid a boatload of money to one of Clinton's friends, the lawyers, that's not corrupt. It's not criminal because the plenary power of the pardon. But in the case of Joe Biden and his pardons, they were so specific. Back 14 years, covering everything you've ever done.

I mean, when I say specific, they were broad, but they had time stuff on them. It was very – and that – Least leads to questions because the plenary power is true, but the question is what was going on here? And I did get responses from some of them, and those things are ongoing.

I mean, when I say specific, they were broad, but they had time stuff on them. It was very – and that – Least leads to questions because the plenary power is true, but the question is what was going on here? And I did get responses from some of them, and those things are ongoing.

I mean, when I say specific, they were broad, but they had time stuff on them. It was very – and that – Least leads to questions because the plenary power is true, but the question is what was going on here? And I did get responses from some of them, and those things are ongoing.

Well, first of all, the most glaring example of weaponization of government that we've probably ever seen is, at least in terms of numbers, is the January 6th use of the 1512 charge. The 1512 charge was written 20 years ago to deal with evidence, destruction of evidence, physical evidence,