Ed Martin (intro by Charlie Kirk)

And I think we're going to see more and more, well, I'm going to be a part of it, uncovering broadly how the weaponization has impacted people. You know, Jack Smith, how he was using, Jack Smith used the grand jury in D.C., friendly grand jury, to get lots of information. And then he went down to Florida and, to move the case against Trump. That's weaponization.

And I think we're going to see more and more, well, I'm going to be a part of it, uncovering broadly how the weaponization has impacted people. You know, Jack Smith, how he was using, Jack Smith used the grand jury in D.C., friendly grand jury, to get lots of information. And then he went down to Florida and, to move the case against Trump. That's weaponization.

And I think we're going to see more and more, well, I'm going to be a part of it, uncovering broadly how the weaponization has impacted people. You know, Jack Smith, how he was using, Jack Smith used the grand jury in D.C., friendly grand jury, to get lots of information. And then he went down to Florida and, to move the case against Trump. That's weaponization.

That's the use of the government, the law against individuals in ways that we haven't seen done before. And again, maybe it's not criminal. I don't know, but we're going to find out.

That's the use of the government, the law against individuals in ways that we haven't seen done before. And again, maybe it's not criminal. I don't know, but we're going to find out.

That's the use of the government, the law against individuals in ways that we haven't seen done before. And again, maybe it's not criminal. I don't know, but we're going to find out.

Yes. Yes, it could. Yes, it could. Certainly could. Look, Vince, I'll tell you something I've talked a lot about recently, and I want to say to your viewers. Justice right now requires two things. It requires the truth, transparency, and then accountability by prosecution, in my opinion. In other words, right now, all of us in this country do not trust the government so much.

Yes. Yes, it could. Yes, it could. Certainly could. Look, Vince, I'll tell you something I've talked a lot about recently, and I want to say to your viewers. Justice right now requires two things. It requires the truth, transparency, and then accountability by prosecution, in my opinion. In other words, right now, all of us in this country do not trust the government so much.

Yes. Yes, it could. Yes, it could. Certainly could. Look, Vince, I'll tell you something I've talked a lot about recently, and I want to say to your viewers. Justice right now requires two things. It requires the truth, transparency, and then accountability by prosecution, in my opinion. In other words, right now, all of us in this country do not trust the government so much.

We're in the opposite. We're in the anti-Reagan moment. When Reagan said trust and verify, we're in the distrust and verify. Starting point is I distrust the government. And so if I said tomorrow, hey, Vince, I'm going to prosecute so-and-so, you should say, I don't trust you. I don't trust anybody. Is that weaponization?

We're in the opposite. We're in the anti-Reagan moment. When Reagan said trust and verify, we're in the distrust and verify. Starting point is I distrust the government. And so if I said tomorrow, hey, Vince, I'm going to prosecute so-and-so, you should say, I don't trust you. I don't trust anybody. Is that weaponization?

We're in the opposite. We're in the anti-Reagan moment. When Reagan said trust and verify, we're in the distrust and verify. Starting point is I distrust the government. And so if I said tomorrow, hey, Vince, I'm going to prosecute so-and-so, you should say, I don't trust you. I don't trust anybody. Is that weaponization?

So what you have to do first to get real justice right now is be transparent. Get the truth out. Tell me what actually happened. What was Jack Smith doing when he shopped the grand jury to go to Florida? Tell me those facts so I can trust when you say next he's going to held accountable this way. And let me tell you something. Like, for example, Fauci.

So what you have to do first to get real justice right now is be transparent. Get the truth out. Tell me what actually happened. What was Jack Smith doing when he shopped the grand jury to go to Florida? Tell me those facts so I can trust when you say next he's going to held accountable this way. And let me tell you something. Like, for example, Fauci.

So what you have to do first to get real justice right now is be transparent. Get the truth out. Tell me what actually happened. What was Jack Smith doing when he shopped the grand jury to go to Florida? Tell me those facts so I can trust when you say next he's going to held accountable this way. And let me tell you something. Like, for example, Fauci.

What Fauci looks like he was doing, maybe it was legal. But he got a pardon. So I'm going to ask. I can ask him, what'd you do? And he has to answer. But even more importantly, maybe his chief of staff or one of his lawyers is sitting at home saying we were doing some stuff that wasn't really copacetic. Now a prosecutor can say, look, if I want to get to the truth, I want to know what happened.

What Fauci looks like he was doing, maybe it was legal. But he got a pardon. So I'm going to ask. I can ask him, what'd you do? And he has to answer. But even more importantly, maybe his chief of staff or one of his lawyers is sitting at home saying we were doing some stuff that wasn't really copacetic. Now a prosecutor can say, look, if I want to get to the truth, I want to know what happened.

What Fauci looks like he was doing, maybe it was legal. But he got a pardon. So I'm going to ask. I can ask him, what'd you do? And he has to answer. But even more importantly, maybe his chief of staff or one of his lawyers is sitting at home saying we were doing some stuff that wasn't really copacetic. Now a prosecutor can say, look, if I want to get to the truth, I want to know what happened.

Maybe I've got to take off the table prosecuting you. So maybe I give immunity to one of those guys and say now, you know, tell me the truth of what's going on. So you're protected. And I think more and more right now, we can't win the fight in the courts fast enough if we are not advocating on the truth. And that's what it means to be focused on weaponization.

Maybe I've got to take off the table prosecuting you. So maybe I give immunity to one of those guys and say now, you know, tell me the truth of what's going on. So you're protected. And I think more and more right now, we can't win the fight in the courts fast enough if we are not advocating on the truth. And that's what it means to be focused on weaponization.