Elena
👤 PersonAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
and he experimented with other variables too like suspending the dummy arm from either a forklift or attaching it to the crash dummy and then trying both head-on and sideswipe type collisions and he testified that all of his tests at all speeds and no matter how the crash arm was positioned all of those tests showed that the damage to the example tail light was quote completely inconsistent with the damage to karen's tail light
and he experimented with other variables too like suspending the dummy arm from either a forklift or attaching it to the crash dummy and then trying both head-on and sideswipe type collisions and he testified that all of his tests at all speeds and no matter how the crash arm was positioned all of those tests showed that the damage to the example tail light was quote completely inconsistent with the damage to karen's tail light
and he experimented with other variables too like suspending the dummy arm from either a forklift or attaching it to the crash dummy and then trying both head-on and sideswipe type collisions and he testified that all of his tests at all speeds and no matter how the crash arm was positioned all of those tests showed that the damage to the example tail light was quote completely inconsistent with the damage to karen's tail light
And he said that the damage to the clothing on the crash arm was also inconsistent with the tears to John's clothes. In particular, he noted that the diffusers that are inside of Karen's taillight were completely broken, which didn't occur in any of his tests. And likewise, John's hoodie had puncture marks and holes on it that were not found in his tests either.
And he said that the damage to the clothing on the crash arm was also inconsistent with the tears to John's clothes. In particular, he noted that the diffusers that are inside of Karen's taillight were completely broken, which didn't occur in any of his tests. And likewise, John's hoodie had puncture marks and holes on it that were not found in his tests either.
And he said that the damage to the clothing on the crash arm was also inconsistent with the tears to John's clothes. In particular, he noted that the diffusers that are inside of Karen's taillight were completely broken, which didn't occur in any of his tests. And likewise, John's hoodie had puncture marks and holes on it that were not found in his tests either.
After that, I thought that Brennan did an okay job of cross-examining Dr. Wolf, but probably not good enough to discredit him or his findings, or make him look worse than Dr. Welcher, honestly. One point we knew Brennan would make is that the defense team asked Dr. Wolf to communicate with them over Signal, which is an encrypted app that doesn't save messages.
After that, I thought that Brennan did an okay job of cross-examining Dr. Wolf, but probably not good enough to discredit him or his findings, or make him look worse than Dr. Welcher, honestly. One point we knew Brennan would make is that the defense team asked Dr. Wolf to communicate with them over Signal, which is an encrypted app that doesn't save messages.
After that, I thought that Brennan did an okay job of cross-examining Dr. Wolf, but probably not good enough to discredit him or his findings, or make him look worse than Dr. Welcher, honestly. One point we knew Brennan would make is that the defense team asked Dr. Wolf to communicate with them over Signal, which is an encrypted app that doesn't save messages.
And Wolf also admitted to deleting between 50 and 100 text messages between himself and the defense team, But he argued that that was just a normal part of his routine after a case was done. Now, I'm not sure how much weight the jury will give that. It is a little sketchy. Is it sketchier than all of the communication going on with the prosecution witnesses?
And Wolf also admitted to deleting between 50 and 100 text messages between himself and the defense team, But he argued that that was just a normal part of his routine after a case was done. Now, I'm not sure how much weight the jury will give that. It is a little sketchy. Is it sketchier than all of the communication going on with the prosecution witnesses?
And Wolf also admitted to deleting between 50 and 100 text messages between himself and the defense team, But he argued that that was just a normal part of his routine after a case was done. Now, I'm not sure how much weight the jury will give that. It is a little sketchy. Is it sketchier than all of the communication going on with the prosecution witnesses?
You know, the butt dials and everything? Probably not. Brennan also took issue with the fact that in previous proceedings, Dr. Wolfe gave the defense a list of questions that he would like to be asked and also said how he would answer those questions. Attorney Brennan tried to frame it like it was a script, like Dr. Wolfe was pre-writing these questions to intentionally mislead the jury.
You know, the butt dials and everything? Probably not. Brennan also took issue with the fact that in previous proceedings, Dr. Wolfe gave the defense a list of questions that he would like to be asked and also said how he would answer those questions. Attorney Brennan tried to frame it like it was a script, like Dr. Wolfe was pre-writing these questions to intentionally mislead the jury.
You know, the butt dials and everything? Probably not. Brennan also took issue with the fact that in previous proceedings, Dr. Wolfe gave the defense a list of questions that he would like to be asked and also said how he would answer those questions. Attorney Brennan tried to frame it like it was a script, like Dr. Wolfe was pre-writing these questions to intentionally mislead the jury.
And maybe there's some truth to that, but I also don't think it's that strange for one of these paid expert witnesses to make an outline of what's important to emphasize during direct examination. And again, I could be totally off base here.
And maybe there's some truth to that, but I also don't think it's that strange for one of these paid expert witnesses to make an outline of what's important to emphasize during direct examination. And again, I could be totally off base here.
And maybe there's some truth to that, but I also don't think it's that strange for one of these paid expert witnesses to make an outline of what's important to emphasize during direct examination. And again, I could be totally off base here.
Maybe the jury is actually giving a lot of weight to these things, but the way I see it, this probably falls within how you'd expect a witness to prepare for questioning. Now, when it comes to questions about the actual science and experiments, the biggest point the prosecution made was that the dummy arm that Wolf used was probably lighter than John's arm.
Maybe the jury is actually giving a lot of weight to these things, but the way I see it, this probably falls within how you'd expect a witness to prepare for questioning. Now, when it comes to questions about the actual science and experiments, the biggest point the prosecution made was that the dummy arm that Wolf used was probably lighter than John's arm.