Elena

And he argued that basically all of the 30 are equally valid. There's no scientific reason to think that one or some of these 30 are any more likely to have occurred than any others. Now, assuming that John's phone was last used at 12.32am and 9 seconds, it turns out that 25 of these 30 possible values would mean that John's phone was last used after Karen's backup maneuver.

And he argued that basically all of the 30 are equally valid. There's no scientific reason to think that one or some of these 30 are any more likely to have occurred than any others. Now, assuming that John's phone was last used at 12.32am and 9 seconds, it turns out that 25 of these 30 possible values would mean that John's phone was last used after Karen's backup maneuver.

Two of the possible values would mean that John's phone was last used at the same time as Karen's backup maneuver. And only three of the 30 possible values, 10%, would mean that John's phone was last used before Karen's backup maneuver. Now remember, this is based off Aperture's own data.

Two of the possible values would mean that John's phone was last used at the same time as Karen's backup maneuver. And only three of the 30 possible values, 10%, would mean that John's phone was last used before Karen's backup maneuver. Now remember, this is based off Aperture's own data.

Two of the possible values would mean that John's phone was last used at the same time as Karen's backup maneuver. And only three of the 30 possible values, 10%, would mean that John's phone was last used before Karen's backup maneuver. Now remember, this is based off Aperture's own data.

The prosecution's own reports show that 25 of the 30 possible values would mean that John's phone continued to be used after Karen's car backed up. And the last point on direct is that DeSogre said that there was no evidence of Karen's car being in any sort of collision on the night of the incident. No evidence on the airbag control module and no evidence in the tech stream data.

The prosecution's own reports show that 25 of the 30 possible values would mean that John's phone continued to be used after Karen's car backed up. And the last point on direct is that DeSogre said that there was no evidence of Karen's car being in any sort of collision on the night of the incident. No evidence on the airbag control module and no evidence in the tech stream data.

The prosecution's own reports show that 25 of the 30 possible values would mean that John's phone continued to be used after Karen's car backed up. And the last point on direct is that DeSogre said that there was no evidence of Karen's car being in any sort of collision on the night of the incident. No evidence on the airbag control module and no evidence in the tech stream data.

Now, I do want to say, throughout my recaps, I've tried to steer clear of commenting on the judge too much. But even I've got to say, she was not making it easy for the defense here. There were like 25, maybe even 30 objections that were sustained just during the first direct examination. And sometimes an objection would come and be sustained before Jackson could really even get his question out.

Now, I do want to say, throughout my recaps, I've tried to steer clear of commenting on the judge too much. But even I've got to say, she was not making it easy for the defense here. There were like 25, maybe even 30 objections that were sustained just during the first direct examination. And sometimes an objection would come and be sustained before Jackson could really even get his question out.

Now, I do want to say, throughout my recaps, I've tried to steer clear of commenting on the judge too much. But even I've got to say, she was not making it easy for the defense here. There were like 25, maybe even 30 objections that were sustained just during the first direct examination. And sometimes an objection would come and be sustained before Jackson could really even get his question out.

And then on Cross, we definitely got to see a different side of Brennan from the prosecution. Remember, Brennan spent most of his career as a defense attorney, so Cross is probably where he has the most experience. And we definitely got to see his feisty side, shall we say. He first got DeSogra to admit that he's not saying that Karen's car never got into a collision on the night of the incident.

And then on Cross, we definitely got to see a different side of Brennan from the prosecution. Remember, Brennan spent most of his career as a defense attorney, so Cross is probably where he has the most experience. And we definitely got to see his feisty side, shall we say. He first got DeSogra to admit that he's not saying that Karen's car never got into a collision on the night of the incident.

And then on Cross, we definitely got to see a different side of Brennan from the prosecution. Remember, Brennan spent most of his career as a defense attorney, so Cross is probably where he has the most experience. And we definitely got to see his feisty side, shall we say. He first got DeSogra to admit that he's not saying that Karen's car never got into a collision on the night of the incident.

He's just saying that none of the tech stream data events were triggered by a collision. And DeSogra also admitted that he's not an expert in mobile forensics, nor did he conduct any independent testing in this case. We know he just analyzed and critiques reports from others.

He's just saying that none of the tech stream data events were triggered by a collision. And DeSogra also admitted that he's not an expert in mobile forensics, nor did he conduct any independent testing in this case. We know he just analyzed and critiques reports from others.

He's just saying that none of the tech stream data events were triggered by a collision. And DeSogra also admitted that he's not an expert in mobile forensics, nor did he conduct any independent testing in this case. We know he just analyzed and critiques reports from others.

And then Brennan takes Sosogra down several paths about different assumptions that he might have made when doing the analysis. Like, for example, what if he incorrectly assumed that some of the phone call logs used for the syncing were between the Lexus call system and an iPhone instead of between just two iPhones?

And then Brennan takes Sosogra down several paths about different assumptions that he might have made when doing the analysis. Like, for example, what if he incorrectly assumed that some of the phone call logs used for the syncing were between the Lexus call system and an iPhone instead of between just two iPhones?

And then Brennan takes Sosogra down several paths about different assumptions that he might have made when doing the analysis. Like, for example, what if he incorrectly assumed that some of the phone call logs used for the syncing were between the Lexus call system and an iPhone instead of between just two iPhones?