Elena

But Dr. Russell said it's actually possible for only the upper jaw to hit the skin, which would leave the underside uninjured. Now, there was another tense moment when Dr. Russell was asked about the holes in John's hoodie and whether they had been swabbed for DNA.

But Dr. Russell said it's actually possible for only the upper jaw to hit the skin, which would leave the underside uninjured. Now, there was another tense moment when Dr. Russell was asked about the holes in John's hoodie and whether they had been swabbed for DNA.

But Dr. Russell said it's actually possible for only the upper jaw to hit the skin, which would leave the underside uninjured. Now, there was another tense moment when Dr. Russell was asked about the holes in John's hoodie and whether they had been swabbed for DNA.

Because right after Brennan asked this, Alessi stood up and said, quote, The defense moves strongly, vigorously for a mistrial with prejudice. His argument was that since the prosecution didn't call their dog DNA expert during their case, they don't have any basis to bring it up during Dr. Russell's cross-examination.

Because right after Brennan asked this, Alessi stood up and said, quote, The defense moves strongly, vigorously for a mistrial with prejudice. His argument was that since the prosecution didn't call their dog DNA expert during their case, they don't have any basis to bring it up during Dr. Russell's cross-examination.

Because right after Brennan asked this, Alessi stood up and said, quote, The defense moves strongly, vigorously for a mistrial with prejudice. His argument was that since the prosecution didn't call their dog DNA expert during their case, they don't have any basis to bring it up during Dr. Russell's cross-examination.

But unsurprisingly, the judge denied the motion and allowed the prosecution to continue with their line of questioning. And Dr. Russell confirmed that the holes in the hoodie didn't contain any dog DNA, but they did contain pig DNA, which a lot of people think could be from dog treats. And finally, Brennan confronted her with a report from Dr. John Walsh.

But unsurprisingly, the judge denied the motion and allowed the prosecution to continue with their line of questioning. And Dr. Russell confirmed that the holes in the hoodie didn't contain any dog DNA, but they did contain pig DNA, which a lot of people think could be from dog treats. And finally, Brennan confronted her with a report from Dr. John Walsh.

But unsurprisingly, the judge denied the motion and allowed the prosecution to continue with their line of questioning. And Dr. Russell confirmed that the holes in the hoodie didn't contain any dog DNA, but they did contain pig DNA, which a lot of people think could be from dog treats. And finally, Brennan confronted her with a report from Dr. John Walsh.

And that report said that John's arm injuries could not have been the result of a dog attack. But Dr. Russell argued that Walsh works in a military clinic, so his knowledge of dog bites might be less or smaller in scope than hers as an ER doctor. Now overall, I thought that Dr. Russell held up well against cross-examination, and she proved to be a pretty solid witness for the defense.

And that report said that John's arm injuries could not have been the result of a dog attack. But Dr. Russell argued that Walsh works in a military clinic, so his knowledge of dog bites might be less or smaller in scope than hers as an ER doctor. Now overall, I thought that Dr. Russell held up well against cross-examination, and she proved to be a pretty solid witness for the defense.

And that report said that John's arm injuries could not have been the result of a dog attack. But Dr. Russell argued that Walsh works in a military clinic, so his knowledge of dog bites might be less or smaller in scope than hers as an ER doctor. Now overall, I thought that Dr. Russell held up well against cross-examination, and she proved to be a pretty solid witness for the defense.

Remember, it's on the prosecution to prove that the injuries were from a tail light, not necessarily on the defense to prove that the injuries were from a dog bite. All the defense has to do is bring up enough doubt in the jurors' minds. And if those jurors aren't totally sure that the injuries came from a taillight, it might be hard for them to convict.

Remember, it's on the prosecution to prove that the injuries were from a tail light, not necessarily on the defense to prove that the injuries were from a dog bite. All the defense has to do is bring up enough doubt in the jurors' minds. And if those jurors aren't totally sure that the injuries came from a taillight, it might be hard for them to convict.

Remember, it's on the prosecution to prove that the injuries were from a tail light, not necessarily on the defense to prove that the injuries were from a dog bite. All the defense has to do is bring up enough doubt in the jurors' minds. And if those jurors aren't totally sure that the injuries came from a taillight, it might be hard for them to convict.

Now the next witness for the defense was Dighton Police Sergeant Nicholas Barros. And I was honestly surprised to see him on the defense's witness list, because he was called by the prosecution in the first trial. But it turns out Sergeant Barros had testimony that I think was actually a huge win for the defense.

Now the next witness for the defense was Dighton Police Sergeant Nicholas Barros. And I was honestly surprised to see him on the defense's witness list, because he was called by the prosecution in the first trial. But it turns out Sergeant Barros had testimony that I think was actually a huge win for the defense.

Now the next witness for the defense was Dighton Police Sergeant Nicholas Barros. And I was honestly surprised to see him on the defense's witness list, because he was called by the prosecution in the first trial. But it turns out Sergeant Barros had testimony that I think was actually a huge win for the defense.

On January 29th, he joined Michael Proctor and Yuri Buchanik as they towed Karen's car from her parents' house in Dayton. At the time of the towing, Karen's taillight had, quote, a crack missing, but was not completely damaged. And Barrows went on to specify that the one piece that was missing was only about the size of a dollar bill.

On January 29th, he joined Michael Proctor and Yuri Buchanik as they towed Karen's car from her parents' house in Dayton. At the time of the towing, Karen's taillight had, quote, a crack missing, but was not completely damaged. And Barrows went on to specify that the one piece that was missing was only about the size of a dollar bill.