Elena

I hope you guys are still with me. Now, something I find interesting is that in the first trial, it was the prosecution who called for these texts to be read. And in this trial, it's the defense. Because the way you interpret these could be different depending on your opinions on the trial, right?

I hope you guys are still with me. Now, something I find interesting is that in the first trial, it was the prosecution who called for these texts to be read. And in this trial, it's the defense. Because the way you interpret these could be different depending on your opinions on the trial, right?

I hope you guys are still with me. Now, something I find interesting is that in the first trial, it was the prosecution who called for these texts to be read. And in this trial, it's the defense. Because the way you interpret these could be different depending on your opinions on the trial, right?

If you lean more towards the prosecution side, you might look at these and say, well, geez, here's a woman who's clearly unhappy with her relationship. Clearly cheating, at least to some extent. Could this contribute to a motive for her to want to get rid of her boyfriend so she could be with Brian full-time?

If you lean more towards the prosecution side, you might look at these and say, well, geez, here's a woman who's clearly unhappy with her relationship. Clearly cheating, at least to some extent. Could this contribute to a motive for her to want to get rid of her boyfriend so she could be with Brian full-time?

If you lean more towards the prosecution side, you might look at these and say, well, geez, here's a woman who's clearly unhappy with her relationship. Clearly cheating, at least to some extent. Could this contribute to a motive for her to want to get rid of her boyfriend so she could be with Brian full-time?

But if you lean more towards the defense side, you might instead say, okay, we have a guy who's been attracted to his buddy's girlfriend for a long time. She finally seems to reciprocate for a bit, and then she ghosts. Could that be motive for him to want to get rid of the boyfriend? Could there be some jealousy there?

But if you lean more towards the defense side, you might instead say, okay, we have a guy who's been attracted to his buddy's girlfriend for a long time. She finally seems to reciprocate for a bit, and then she ghosts. Could that be motive for him to want to get rid of the boyfriend? Could there be some jealousy there?

But if you lean more towards the defense side, you might instead say, okay, we have a guy who's been attracted to his buddy's girlfriend for a long time. She finally seems to reciprocate for a bit, and then she ghosts. Could that be motive for him to want to get rid of the boyfriend? Could there be some jealousy there?

So the fact that it was entered into evidence by the defense suggests that they think the texts make Brian look more guilty than Karen. Will the jury see it that way? What do you guys think? My take? I don't think that these texts make either Karen or Brian look great. But what I don't see is a clear arrow pointing to murder.

So the fact that it was entered into evidence by the defense suggests that they think the texts make Brian look more guilty than Karen. Will the jury see it that way? What do you guys think? My take? I don't think that these texts make either Karen or Brian look great. But what I don't see is a clear arrow pointing to murder.

So the fact that it was entered into evidence by the defense suggests that they think the texts make Brian look more guilty than Karen. Will the jury see it that way? What do you guys think? My take? I don't think that these texts make either Karen or Brian look great. But what I don't see is a clear arrow pointing to murder.

I don't see like the, I'll get rid of him so we can be together, that kind of thing. I don't see that from either side. So are they guilty of cheating? Probably. Bad sexting? Definitely. But murder? I'm not convinced for either one of them. Then Monday the 12th was, yes, another full day of testimony from Sgt. Bukinick. which means this guy was on the stand for three full days.

I don't see like the, I'll get rid of him so we can be together, that kind of thing. I don't see that from either side. So are they guilty of cheating? Probably. Bad sexting? Definitely. But murder? I'm not convinced for either one of them. Then Monday the 12th was, yes, another full day of testimony from Sgt. Bukinick. which means this guy was on the stand for three full days.

I don't see like the, I'll get rid of him so we can be together, that kind of thing. I don't see that from either side. So are they guilty of cheating? Probably. Bad sexting? Definitely. But murder? I'm not convinced for either one of them. Then Monday the 12th was, yes, another full day of testimony from Sgt. Bukinick. which means this guy was on the stand for three full days.

We're going to go rapid fire to the most important stuff here for all of our sanity. Rapid fire point one. On cross-examination, Jackson mentioned that a plow driver around the Canton area saw a Ford Edge parked next to 34 Fairview around 2.30 a.m., and then he said that that car was gone when he returned about an hour later.

We're going to go rapid fire to the most important stuff here for all of our sanity. Rapid fire point one. On cross-examination, Jackson mentioned that a plow driver around the Canton area saw a Ford Edge parked next to 34 Fairview around 2.30 a.m., and then he said that that car was gone when he returned about an hour later.

We're going to go rapid fire to the most important stuff here for all of our sanity. Rapid fire point one. On cross-examination, Jackson mentioned that a plow driver around the Canton area saw a Ford Edge parked next to 34 Fairview around 2.30 a.m., and then he said that that car was gone when he returned about an hour later.

Now, Buchanick testified that he didn't investigate the Ford Edge further, even though it was known that someone in the Albert family owned that type of car. Next, Jackson brought up that Proctor wrote an affidavit that said that Karen's car was seized by them at 5.30 p.m., but it later came out that the car was actually taken more than an hour earlier at 4.12 p.m.

Now, Buchanick testified that he didn't investigate the Ford Edge further, even though it was known that someone in the Albert family owned that type of car. Next, Jackson brought up that Proctor wrote an affidavit that said that Karen's car was seized by them at 5.30 p.m., but it later came out that the car was actually taken more than an hour earlier at 4.12 p.m.