Emanuele Atturo

I also remember recently with Sviontek, she lost a match in which she had simply invested Sviontek in the first set.

but then to Roland Garros.

But then, slowly, he came out of Montec, also because at a distance Rivachina seems to have more and more physical difficulty in moving.

So his fragility is also linked to this, to the fact that he always needs to hit from a distance, that physically he doesn't seem to have the qualities to be at that level.

things that obviously with Sabalenka are less visible, with Svjontek they are bright and instead in this match he did something that I did not expect.

In my opinion at that moment there was also a bit of

Instead of Sabalenka's lack of tension, a lack of ability to react, to see that your opponent is going up a little, and to understand that you have to go and equalize that force there, which is sometimes really overwhelming.

That's how it is.

It's crazy.

Yes, and she totally responded.

Incredible.

Incredible.

Yes, let's also take the fact that the game ended with 92 points, 20 per 1.

And in the third set Sabalenka won 3 more points.

Sorry, Vintorio Ipagni has three more points.

But it's another of those games in which Sabalenka

I mean, he always lost by losing the sliding doors of the game.

I think that's the theme of this tournament, by the way.

I mean, it seems to me that between the semifinals and the finals, this tournament, these Australian Open, expressed a difference, obviously, on various levels, on various characteristics.

players who manage to win very difficult games and players who manage to lose very difficult games to lose.