Emily Jashinsky

I mean, your point is that the straight news coverage is shot through with the bias that should be on the editorial side if there were this traditional neutral firewall, which just doesn't really exist. Nobody believes that it exists. they will tell you in our newsroom every day, there's no overlap, but they believe roughly the same things.

I mean, your point is that the straight news coverage is shot through with the bias that should be on the editorial side if there were this traditional neutral firewall, which just doesn't really exist. Nobody believes that it exists. they will tell you in our newsroom every day, there's no overlap, but they believe roughly the same things.

Even if there's, you know, little debates, they believe roughly the same thing. So why wasn't there the Peter Baker stories? Like, that's the question we need to have answered about the White House being, having doctors coming in and out of it, about donors being upset when they saw him in person. Like, those stories were nowhere to be found. Instead, it was the cheap fake storyline.

Even if there's, you know, little debates, they believe roughly the same thing. So why wasn't there the Peter Baker stories? Like, that's the question we need to have answered about the White House being, having doctors coming in and out of it, about donors being upset when they saw him in person. Like, those stories were nowhere to be found. Instead, it was the cheap fake storyline.

Even if there's, you know, little debates, they believe roughly the same thing. So why wasn't there the Peter Baker stories? Like, that's the question we need to have answered about the White House being, having doctors coming in and out of it, about donors being upset when they saw him in person. Like, those stories were nowhere to be found. Instead, it was the cheap fake storyline.

Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.

Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.

Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.

Well, I mean, she's just the combination. She has a combination that's really, I think, dangerous, which is sanctimonious and closed-minded. And when you combine those two things, it's really toxic, and it makes for very unhappy people, and I think very unappealing media personalities. And so I'm not entirely surprised by this, but it's just...

Well, I mean, she's just the combination. She has a combination that's really, I think, dangerous, which is sanctimonious and closed-minded. And when you combine those two things, it's really toxic, and it makes for very unhappy people, and I think very unappealing media personalities. And so I'm not entirely surprised by this, but it's just...

Well, I mean, she's just the combination. She has a combination that's really, I think, dangerous, which is sanctimonious and closed-minded. And when you combine those two things, it's really toxic, and it makes for very unhappy people, and I think very unappealing media personalities. And so I'm not entirely surprised by this, but it's just...

I think there's a type of journalist who gets validation and sort of the moral affirmations of commentary. And I think unfortunately she's one of those people and it's very dangerous.

I think there's a type of journalist who gets validation and sort of the moral affirmations of commentary. And I think unfortunately she's one of those people and it's very dangerous.

I think there's a type of journalist who gets validation and sort of the moral affirmations of commentary. And I think unfortunately she's one of those people and it's very dangerous.

But you were right. This is what drives me crazy is like you were right. And she was holding herself up as the as the sort of fact based arbiter of truth and using her platform to smear you. And it's turned out that you were vindicated.

But you were right. This is what drives me crazy is like you were right. And she was holding herself up as the as the sort of fact based arbiter of truth and using her platform to smear you. And it's turned out that you were vindicated.

But you were right. This is what drives me crazy is like you were right. And she was holding herself up as the as the sort of fact based arbiter of truth and using her platform to smear you. And it's turned out that you were vindicated.

So that's what I think is just like so egregious that there's no humility looking back and thinking like I was the one who was in the wrong and I was coming out real hot. I was real sanctified. I was real close minded. I was wrong. Megan was right. Shouldn't have smeared her. There's just none of that. It's just more smears.

So that's what I think is just like so egregious that there's no humility looking back and thinking like I was the one who was in the wrong and I was coming out real hot. I was real sanctified. I was real close minded. I was wrong. Megan was right. Shouldn't have smeared her. There's just none of that. It's just more smears.

So that's what I think is just like so egregious that there's no humility looking back and thinking like I was the one who was in the wrong and I was coming out real hot. I was real sanctified. I was real close minded. I was wrong. Megan was right. Shouldn't have smeared her. There's just none of that. It's just more smears.