Emily Jashinsky
π€ SpeakerVoice Profile Active
This person's voice can be automatically recognized across podcast episodes using AI voice matching.
Appearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
Well, I mean, it would be if he had been peppering those questions to you as like a devil's advocate, that may have been different. But that's I think you're right to say that's how he was actually characterizing the show. And it sounds to me like he's not familiar with what you do regularly on the program at all.
Well, I mean, it would be if he had been peppering those questions to you as like a devil's advocate, that may have been different. But that's I think you're right to say that's how he was actually characterizing the show. And it sounds to me like he's not familiar with what you do regularly on the program at all.
I agree, because if you had been listening to or watching the show leading up to the election, you would have had all of the context of how seriously you took those issues, how deeply you covered those issues and how much they mattered to you. whether it was sports, immigration, whatever, and all of that would have made way more sense.
I agree, because if you had been listening to or watching the show leading up to the election, you would have had all of the context of how seriously you took those issues, how deeply you covered those issues and how much they mattered to you. whether it was sports, immigration, whatever, and all of that would have made way more sense.
I agree, because if you had been listening to or watching the show leading up to the election, you would have had all of the context of how seriously you took those issues, how deeply you covered those issues and how much they mattered to you. whether it was sports, immigration, whatever, and all of that would have made way more sense.
But if you're only getting your information sort of dripped out through the coverage from liberal bloggers and people on Twitter, then yeah, that sort of sounds like Exactly like my impression of the questions.
But if you're only getting your information sort of dripped out through the coverage from liberal bloggers and people on Twitter, then yeah, that sort of sounds like Exactly like my impression of the questions.
But if you're only getting your information sort of dripped out through the coverage from liberal bloggers and people on Twitter, then yeah, that sort of sounds like Exactly like my impression of the questions.
And by the way, another thing it misunderstands, I mean, I think even to ask the question about whether you wish you had a producer, I thought the implication was that maybe you're going off the rails too much or whatever. But by the way...
And by the way, another thing it misunderstands, I mean, I think even to ask the question about whether you wish you had a producer, I thought the implication was that maybe you're going off the rails too much or whatever. But by the way...
And by the way, another thing it misunderstands, I mean, I think even to ask the question about whether you wish you had a producer, I thought the implication was that maybe you're going off the rails too much or whatever. But by the way...
The reason people like this medium is because they get both the level of the quality and analysis and sophistication and political commentary, but they trust it more because they see you with no filter. And that's the whole point.
The reason people like this medium is because they get both the level of the quality and analysis and sophistication and political commentary, but they trust it more because they see you with no filter. And that's the whole point.
The reason people like this medium is because they get both the level of the quality and analysis and sophistication and political commentary, but they trust it more because they see you with no filter. And that's the whole point.
Yeah. And that's the other thing I thought was interesting from that question is that, again, we spent the first part of the show talking about how the White House screwed up yesterday. I mean, you don't need to. It's not like you have to miss one episode and then you're out of the loop. You do this all the time. That's why people like you and trust you. So it's actually part of the trust.
Yeah. And that's the other thing I thought was interesting from that question is that, again, we spent the first part of the show talking about how the White House screwed up yesterday. I mean, you don't need to. It's not like you have to miss one episode and then you're out of the loop. You do this all the time. That's why people like you and trust you. So it's actually part of the trust.
Yeah. And that's the other thing I thought was interesting from that question is that, again, we spent the first part of the show talking about how the White House screwed up yesterday. I mean, you don't need to. It's not like you have to miss one episode and then you're out of the loop. You do this all the time. That's why people like you and trust you. So it's actually part of the trust.
Part of the trust is built into you being like, yeah, I think people should vote for Donald Trump. Here is why. And then you can assess my coverage of Trump's policies. You can assess my coverage of Kamala Harry's proposals through that lens. It's actually like his question is completely missing the point.
Part of the trust is built into you being like, yeah, I think people should vote for Donald Trump. Here is why. And then you can assess my coverage of Trump's policies. You can assess my coverage of Kamala Harry's proposals through that lens. It's actually like his question is completely missing the point.
Part of the trust is built into you being like, yeah, I think people should vote for Donald Trump. Here is why. And then you can assess my coverage of Trump's policies. You can assess my coverage of Kamala Harry's proposals through that lens. It's actually like his question is completely missing the point.