Eric Czuleger

Well, then get on our team and we'll make sure to continue to entrench your power while also entrenching our own power. And this is legal, right? So this is that lawfare thing. This is that economic thing. So these are the three warfares. So Australia at a certain point, they said, no, we're not going to take any more of these technologies.

We're not going to work together with the Chinese because we believe that it is against our national interests. It's against our national security. Of course, they ended up getting massive sanctions because of that. As China has come up into being a global economic market, not only are they exporters, but they're also an enormous market for sales.

We're not going to work together with the Chinese because we believe that it is against our national interests. It's against our national security. Of course, they ended up getting massive sanctions because of that. As China has come up into being a global economic market, not only are they exporters, but they're also an enormous market for sales.

We're not going to work together with the Chinese because we believe that it is against our national interests. It's against our national security. Of course, they ended up getting massive sanctions because of that. As China has come up into being a global economic market, not only are they exporters, but they're also an enormous market for sales.

Australian companies want to go in there and use them as a market, but of course this can be used as a cudgel when they are a really powerful market. In 2001, China got accession into the WTO or the World Trade Organization. And the bargain that the United States placed on this was that as they entered the free market, as they entered the globalized world,

Australian companies want to go in there and use them as a market, but of course this can be used as a cudgel when they are a really powerful market. In 2001, China got accession into the WTO or the World Trade Organization. And the bargain that the United States placed on this was that as they entered the free market, as they entered the globalized world,

Australian companies want to go in there and use them as a market, but of course this can be used as a cudgel when they are a really powerful market. In 2001, China got accession into the WTO or the World Trade Organization. And the bargain that the United States placed on this was that as they entered the free market, as they entered the globalized world,

that essentially they would become more liberalized politically, that autocrats would have less and less ability to maintain control in China. But that didn't actually happen. In fact, they just got economically much stronger while also maintaining autocratic control. And so that's why they're able to expand this network throughout the world.

that essentially they would become more liberalized politically, that autocrats would have less and less ability to maintain control in China. But that didn't actually happen. In fact, they just got economically much stronger while also maintaining autocratic control. And so that's why they're able to expand this network throughout the world.

that essentially they would become more liberalized politically, that autocrats would have less and less ability to maintain control in China. But that didn't actually happen. In fact, they just got economically much stronger while also maintaining autocratic control. And so that's why they're able to expand this network throughout the world.

continuing with the doctrine of the three warfares but also never really going into direct kinetic conflict because direct kinetic kinetic conflict or direct you know um aggressive conflict uh would not only risk their trade relationships but it would also risk their internal security and their internal tranquility so we have you know in the united states

continuing with the doctrine of the three warfares but also never really going into direct kinetic conflict because direct kinetic kinetic conflict or direct you know um aggressive conflict uh would not only risk their trade relationships but it would also risk their internal security and their internal tranquility so we have you know in the united states

continuing with the doctrine of the three warfares but also never really going into direct kinetic conflict because direct kinetic kinetic conflict or direct you know um aggressive conflict uh would not only risk their trade relationships but it would also risk their internal security and their internal tranquility so we have you know in the united states

Chinese companies and individuals purchasing land in and around or not in, but around American military bases. As soon as we saw that, we put greater restrictions on that kind of thing.

Chinese companies and individuals purchasing land in and around or not in, but around American military bases. As soon as we saw that, we put greater restrictions on that kind of thing.

Chinese companies and individuals purchasing land in and around or not in, but around American military bases. As soon as we saw that, we put greater restrictions on that kind of thing.

That as well, yeah, and even policing. There are, or at least were, I think they've been hopefully rooted out now, but there were Chinese policing stations that were within American cities where if somebody began to speak against the administration in China, they would be talked to. You can look that up. How? Oh, yeah. Check it out.

That as well, yeah, and even policing. There are, or at least were, I think they've been hopefully rooted out now, but there were Chinese policing stations that were within American cities where if somebody began to speak against the administration in China, they would be talked to. You can look that up. How? Oh, yeah. Check it out.

That as well, yeah, and even policing. There are, or at least were, I think they've been hopefully rooted out now, but there were Chinese policing stations that were within American cities where if somebody began to speak against the administration in China, they would be talked to. You can look that up. How? Oh, yeah. Check it out.

Overseas police. Go to Brookings. The other one seems to be Catholic EDU.