Erica

He might have some kind of First Amendment argument, but I don't think he really does, because I think there is enough evidence of what he did that he was coordinating with these people.

it was private property and it was also breaking these specific laws that were put in place by democrats frankly and so i think he's going to have to face those charges but i think you know what i would what i keep in mind is that for someone like tim waltz for example it's like making statements or like maxine waters you know making statements that are inflammatory is kind of a borderline thing it's like it's free speech

politicians actually have like this speech and debate clause that gives them even more immunity where they're allowed to lie to us.

Get rid of it.

And so there is this extra leniency that they have built in for them, which I hate, but it's just, that's the reality.

And so, and then, you know, as far as connecting Tim waltz to the fraud, like to me, that just takes time.

Like you have to show how was he involved?

What did he know?

When did he know it?

What kind of documentation do we have to prove it?

And that takes time to put together a case.

So I wouldn't expect something like that to happen overnight.

I'm with you.

But again, we don't control all these things.

Like, you know, the Trump administration can arrest people.

Cash can go arrest people.

But, you know, and the Department of Justice can prosecute it.

But.

we do have to deal with just who's in the judicial system today and you're not always going to get the result you want.

And, you know, it also depends on who ends up on the juries.