Filippo Biondi

Yeah, that's generally where you get to as you start to explore some of the comments that the critics make.

It's very confusing.

So old GPR scans under Coffray have only found two small, likely natural voids.

Okay, so there have been two natural voids that have been found under the Coffray scanner.

Pyramid and the the criticism is that they don't show up on your diagrams.

Is that true?

Okay, all right GPR is it is ground penetrating radar It means that we have a radar installed on a sort of grass cutter like that and this radar passes on the ground and

21 meters to 33 meters deep where those known small voids show up in your diagrams why our our diagram are order of magnitude in terms of

penetration let's say let's call penetration that we can have with respect to the ground to a ground penetrating radar now if the gpr scans under the cafre only found two small likely natural voids at 24 1 meters and 33 meters deep we should

who made this remark that I thank him for this remark we can do this they can provide me a geocoded scan of that gpr at minus 20 21 meter

and we can exactly compare my scans because because why 20 21 meters are very small because we can scan 4 kilometers so 25 meters is very is very narrow

and we have to see if in the first pixel line we find the natural voids on my scans because 21 meters it's only one pixel in my scans

I don't know if I am explaining this.

And so we can't resolve the presence of natural voids.

I don't know if I am explaining.

So it's too small for you to pick up?

It's too small, yes.

Okay, got it.

So those two are too small for you to pick up.

But I am not saying that they are not present.