Gabby Del Valle

The official White House Instagram and Twitter accounts posted this picture of him saying Shalom Mahmoud, and Trump himself has said there will be more. In a post on Truth Social, Trump called him a radical foreign pro-Hamas student and said this is the first arrest of many to come.

The official White House Instagram and Twitter accounts posted this picture of him saying Shalom Mahmoud, and Trump himself has said there will be more. In a post on Truth Social, Trump called him a radical foreign pro-Hamas student and said this is the first arrest of many to come.

So in most cases, people in deportation proceedings have the right to a hearing before an immigration judge. So despite what the government is saying, despite what the White House is saying, he cannot just be deported today or tomorrow or this week. He has to go before an immigration judge, and only an immigration judge can decide whether Mahmoud will be deported.

So in most cases, people in deportation proceedings have the right to a hearing before an immigration judge. So despite what the government is saying, despite what the White House is saying, he cannot just be deported today or tomorrow or this week. He has to go before an immigration judge, and only an immigration judge can decide whether Mahmoud will be deported.

So in most cases, people in deportation proceedings have the right to a hearing before an immigration judge. So despite what the government is saying, despite what the White House is saying, he cannot just be deported today or tomorrow or this week. He has to go before an immigration judge, and only an immigration judge can decide whether Mahmoud will be deported.

It works differently depending on what the grounds for deportability are. I'm going to give you a kind of unrelated example. If he were a green card holder and he had been charged with certain crimes, crimes including what is called crimes of moral turpitude or aggravated felonies, which are not all felonies, it's kind of a misnomer, that could then trigger deportation proceedings.

It works differently depending on what the grounds for deportability are. I'm going to give you a kind of unrelated example. If he were a green card holder and he had been charged with certain crimes, crimes including what is called crimes of moral turpitude or aggravated felonies, which are not all felonies, it's kind of a misnomer, that could then trigger deportation proceedings.

It works differently depending on what the grounds for deportability are. I'm going to give you a kind of unrelated example. If he were a green card holder and he had been charged with certain crimes, crimes including what is called crimes of moral turpitude or aggravated felonies, which are not all felonies, it's kind of a misnomer, that could then trigger deportation proceedings.

Or if he were an undocumented immigrant who was in the United States without legal authorization, that could trigger deportation proceedings. This is a really... unusual case.

Or if he were an undocumented immigrant who was in the United States without legal authorization, that could trigger deportation proceedings. This is a really... unusual case.

Or if he were an undocumented immigrant who was in the United States without legal authorization, that could trigger deportation proceedings. This is a really... unusual case.

So because interportability is being argued on this foreign policy ground, I believe the administration is going to have to prove that his activities in the United States are in some way a threat to national security or to the U.S. 's foreign policy interests. The question is what they're going to point to to prove that. Like, is it going to be his involvement in campus protests?

So because interportability is being argued on this foreign policy ground, I believe the administration is going to have to prove that his activities in the United States are in some way a threat to national security or to the U.S. 's foreign policy interests. The question is what they're going to point to to prove that. Like, is it going to be his involvement in campus protests?

So because interportability is being argued on this foreign policy ground, I believe the administration is going to have to prove that his activities in the United States are in some way a threat to national security or to the U.S. 's foreign policy interests. The question is what they're going to point to to prove that. Like, is it going to be his involvement in campus protests?

And if so, is there then a First Amendment counter argument? Like, will his attorney be able to say he was not doing anything dangerous or anything threatening to national security? He was exercising his First Amendment rights. So will the administration then argue that he was doing something beyond speech is what we should be looking out for.

And if so, is there then a First Amendment counter argument? Like, will his attorney be able to say he was not doing anything dangerous or anything threatening to national security? He was exercising his First Amendment rights. So will the administration then argue that he was doing something beyond speech is what we should be looking out for.

And if so, is there then a First Amendment counter argument? Like, will his attorney be able to say he was not doing anything dangerous or anything threatening to national security? He was exercising his First Amendment rights. So will the administration then argue that he was doing something beyond speech is what we should be looking out for.

As far as I know, he is not accused of any acts of violence, of like the occupations, any of that. In fact, I emailed the NYPD asking if he had any kind of like charges or if he had been arrested in connection with any of those events. And I didn't receive a response. But when I was covering these protests last spring, there was no mention of him as one of the people who had been arrested.

As far as I know, he is not accused of any acts of violence, of like the occupations, any of that. In fact, I emailed the NYPD asking if he had any kind of like charges or if he had been arrested in connection with any of those events. And I didn't receive a response. But when I was covering these protests last spring, there was no mention of him as one of the people who had been arrested.

As far as I know, he is not accused of any acts of violence, of like the occupations, any of that. In fact, I emailed the NYPD asking if he had any kind of like charges or if he had been arrested in connection with any of those events. And I didn't receive a response. But when I was covering these protests last spring, there was no mention of him as one of the people who had been arrested.