Gad Saad

that causes it versus there's an Islamic regime with its theology that is really nasty.

All right, here, pause it here for a second.

the cause of that reality?

I mean, yes and no.

So let me explain why I say yes and no.

When you have a complicated geopolitical system,

You can always look, you remember the old butterfly effect, right?

There's a butterfly flaps its wings in the Amazon and then how that reverberates into a cyclone somewhere else, right?

It's kind of bullshit though.

No, but I mean, the principle of...

Fair enough.

But the idea that there are causal networks is such that in this complicated web of causal networks, you can always find a particular entity that you can try to link back all of the causes to that entity.

supporting an Ayatollah to take their place.

It's a pretty big factor.

That's why I asked you to allocate the 100 points.

I'm going to answer off the top of my head, and it's completely speculative, so the numbers I'm going to say are not.

uh let's ascribe 10 out of the 100 points to whatever power the u.s wheels in that region to have allowed that regime to come in but that regime carries the other 90 points of the 100 because they are the ones who for the next 47 years implement the reality that the common version is going to pause it for a second let's pause it for a second

Everything in the world can ultimately be linked back to oxygen, to the United States, to the military complex, to the Zionist lobby.

All of those entities are connected in a meaningful way in this causal network.

But is using Occam's razor, does it really make sense to blame?