Garrett Ziegler

And even if before January 19th, somebody heard me say that. And they doubted it, and they didn't read our 644-page book. I know I sent you guys some copies. They just need to go look at the pardon. They have to see the breadth of this thing. One more point of privilege I want to bring up. The federal judge in Hunter's Los Angeles case, the same district in which he's suing us civilly,

And even if before January 19th, somebody heard me say that. And they doubted it, and they didn't read our 644-page book. I know I sent you guys some copies. They just need to go look at the pardon. They have to see the breadth of this thing. One more point of privilege I want to bring up. The federal judge in Hunter's Los Angeles case, the same district in which he's suing us civilly,

raked Joe over the coals because there is a portion of Joe's pardon to Hunter and his recent pardon of his siblings and their spouses that is not valid, and here it is. When he pardoned Hunter and he pardoned those folks on January 19th, he said the pardon went through the date of the pardon. That is – for a couple of hours, that is unenforceable.

raked Joe over the coals because there is a portion of Joe's pardon to Hunter and his recent pardon of his siblings and their spouses that is not valid, and here it is. When he pardoned Hunter and he pardoned those folks on January 19th, he said the pardon went through the date of the pardon. That is – for a couple of hours, that is unenforceable.

What I mean by that is Joe didn't sign these things at 1159. In the case of Hunter, we know that for a fact. We know he signed it around 530 because they announced it at 6. And of course Joe is fed, wiped, and put to bed at about 8.30 every night. So we know he's not up until 11.59 signing these things. For the amount of hours – and this is technical, but just bear with me.

What I mean by that is Joe didn't sign these things at 1159. In the case of Hunter, we know that for a fact. We know he signed it around 530 because they announced it at 6. And of course Joe is fed, wiped, and put to bed at about 8.30 every night. So we know he's not up until 11.59 signing these things. For the amount of hours – and this is technical, but just bear with me.

For the amount of hours that still were in those two days and after he signed it, you cannot pardon prospective conduct. So the judge in Hunter's federal case said we're not – it's not going to affect this case, but just for the record – Those six hours that occurred from 6 p.m. to midnight on December 1, 2024, that's not covered by the pardon, and yet Joe said it was.

For the amount of hours that still were in those two days and after he signed it, you cannot pardon prospective conduct. So the judge in Hunter's federal case said we're not – it's not going to affect this case, but just for the record – Those six hours that occurred from 6 p.m. to midnight on December 1, 2024, that's not covered by the pardon, and yet Joe said it was.

So he made this mistake again with his siblings. You thought the staff secretary, the Biden equivalent of Will Scharf, the staff secretary, would have made it through the day before. Joe's pardon should have said through January 18 because those hours – It's just pathetic.

So he made this mistake again with his siblings. You thought the staff secretary, the Biden equivalent of Will Scharf, the staff secretary, would have made it through the day before. Joe's pardon should have said through January 18 because those hours – It's just pathetic.

That's why I wanted to bring it up, is they made the mistake again, even after a federal judge excoriated them in the case of Hunter.

That's why I wanted to bring it up, is they made the mistake again, even after a federal judge excoriated them in the case of Hunter.