George Bonaci

Yeah, I think if you're doing things right, the concentration will change. It's almost like when you find something that works, if you do a really good job of saturating it as quickly as possible, you will be by almost definition, like really concentrated there, at least for a period of time.

Yeah, I think if you're doing things right, the concentration will change. It's almost like when you find something that works, if you do a really good job of saturating it as quickly as possible, you will be by almost definition, like really concentrated there, at least for a period of time.

It's really how quickly you can diversify and stack different bets and different wins so that you're not concentrated for too long of a period of time. But I think concentration in and of itself is not a bad thing. It means that you're doing a good job maximizing an area.

It's really how quickly you can diversify and stack different bets and different wins so that you're not concentrated for too long of a period of time. But I think concentration in and of itself is not a bad thing. It means that you're doing a good job maximizing an area.

It's really how quickly you can diversify and stack different bets and different wins so that you're not concentrated for too long of a period of time. But I think concentration in and of itself is not a bad thing. It means that you're doing a good job maximizing an area.

I think communicating the way growth thinks about things is probably like more important than like what specifically they're doing. As long as everyone's aligned that like the growth team's job is actually aligned with everyone else's in the company, which is like we need to be successful. Like growth team's job is not to make anyone happy. It's to make the business successful.

I think communicating the way growth thinks about things is probably like more important than like what specifically they're doing. As long as everyone's aligned that like the growth team's job is actually aligned with everyone else's in the company, which is like we need to be successful. Like growth team's job is not to make anyone happy. It's to make the business successful.

I think communicating the way growth thinks about things is probably like more important than like what specifically they're doing. As long as everyone's aligned that like the growth team's job is actually aligned with everyone else's in the company, which is like we need to be successful. Like growth team's job is not to make anyone happy. It's to make the business successful.

And that might mean like for a period of time working really closely with product or really working really close with product marketing or some other element of the business.

And that might mean like for a period of time working really closely with product or really working really close with product marketing or some other element of the business.

And that might mean like for a period of time working really closely with product or really working really close with product marketing or some other element of the business.

But really, they should recognize and growth should be able to communicate that we're bringing a unique skill set and unique point of view that hopefully is complementary to their skill set and their point of view, but ultimately the same goal of making the business successful.

But really, they should recognize and growth should be able to communicate that we're bringing a unique skill set and unique point of view that hopefully is complementary to their skill set and their point of view, but ultimately the same goal of making the business successful.

But really, they should recognize and growth should be able to communicate that we're bringing a unique skill set and unique point of view that hopefully is complementary to their skill set and their point of view, but ultimately the same goal of making the business successful.

Yeah, I would always skew more junior. I think hiring for potential, especially early on in the business, is far, far more important.

Yeah, I would always skew more junior. I think hiring for potential, especially early on in the business, is far, far more important.

Yeah, I would always skew more junior. I think hiring for potential, especially early on in the business, is far, far more important.

I actually think it would be a mistake to hire someone more senior, like if you're series A. Hiring a really smart generalist that can think in terms of first principles and that can think logically in terms of solving problems is probably more important than anything. What background do you find is best? Yeah.

I actually think it would be a mistake to hire someone more senior, like if you're series A. Hiring a really smart generalist that can think in terms of first principles and that can think logically in terms of solving problems is probably more important than anything. What background do you find is best? Yeah.

I actually think it would be a mistake to hire someone more senior, like if you're series A. Hiring a really smart generalist that can think in terms of first principles and that can think logically in terms of solving problems is probably more important than anything. What background do you find is best? Yeah.