George Hotz
๐ค SpeakerAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
But you mean like the intelligence agencies in America are doing right now?
They're doing it pretty well.
They're doing it pretty well.
They're doing it pretty well.
Well, I mean, of course, they're looking into the latest technologies for control of people, of course.
Well, I mean, of course, they're looking into the latest technologies for control of people, of course.
Well, I mean, of course, they're looking into the latest technologies for control of people, of course.
No, and I'll tell you why the George Hotz character can't. And I thought about this a lot with hacking. Like, I can find exploits in web browsers. I probably still can. I mean, I was better out when I was 24, but... The thing that I lack is the ability to slowly and steadily deploy them over five years. And this is what intelligence agencies are very good at, right?
No, and I'll tell you why the George Hotz character can't. And I thought about this a lot with hacking. Like, I can find exploits in web browsers. I probably still can. I mean, I was better out when I was 24, but... The thing that I lack is the ability to slowly and steadily deploy them over five years. And this is what intelligence agencies are very good at, right?
No, and I'll tell you why the George Hotz character can't. And I thought about this a lot with hacking. Like, I can find exploits in web browsers. I probably still can. I mean, I was better out when I was 24, but... The thing that I lack is the ability to slowly and steadily deploy them over five years. And this is what intelligence agencies are very good at, right?
Intelligence agencies don't have the most sophisticated technology. They just have- Endurance?
Intelligence agencies don't have the most sophisticated technology. They just have- Endurance?
Intelligence agencies don't have the most sophisticated technology. They just have- Endurance?
So the more we can decentralize power, like you could make an argument, by the way, that nobody should have these things. And I would defend that argument. I would, like you're saying that, look, LLMs and AI and machine intelligence can cause a lot of harm, so nobody should have it.
So the more we can decentralize power, like you could make an argument, by the way, that nobody should have these things. And I would defend that argument. I would, like you're saying that, look, LLMs and AI and machine intelligence can cause a lot of harm, so nobody should have it.
So the more we can decentralize power, like you could make an argument, by the way, that nobody should have these things. And I would defend that argument. I would, like you're saying that, look, LLMs and AI and machine intelligence can cause a lot of harm, so nobody should have it.
And I will respect someone philosophically with that position, just like I will respect someone philosophically with the position that nobody should have guns. But I will not respect philosophically with only the trusted authorities should have access to this. Who are the trusted authorities? You know what? I'm not worried about alignment between AI company and their machines.
And I will respect someone philosophically with that position, just like I will respect someone philosophically with the position that nobody should have guns. But I will not respect philosophically with only the trusted authorities should have access to this. Who are the trusted authorities? You know what? I'm not worried about alignment between AI company and their machines.
And I will respect someone philosophically with that position, just like I will respect someone philosophically with the position that nobody should have guns. But I will not respect philosophically with only the trusted authorities should have access to this. Who are the trusted authorities? You know what? I'm not worried about alignment between AI company and their machines.
I'm worried about alignment between me and AI company.