George Knapp

That is, is to take a dump on it and to discredit it and to muddy the waters. And wow, this was a pretty nasty piece of journalism. Don't you agree? Yeah, yeah.

That is, is to take a dump on it and to discredit it and to muddy the waters. And wow, this was a pretty nasty piece of journalism. Don't you agree? Yeah, yeah.

Yeah, I mean, that was really a low blow. And even for UFO debunkers, that really stands out as a pretty nasty attack because it really doesn't fit. Dave Grush was just announced a couple of days ago. He's going to be working with the congressional committee, looking into UAP issues, advising them on where they can look.

Yeah, I mean, that was really a low blow. And even for UFO debunkers, that really stands out as a pretty nasty attack because it really doesn't fit. Dave Grush was just announced a couple of days ago. He's going to be working with the congressional committee, looking into UAP issues, advising them on where they can look.

Yeah, I mean, that was really a low blow. And even for UFO debunkers, that really stands out as a pretty nasty attack because it really doesn't fit. Dave Grush was just announced a couple of days ago. He's going to be working with the congressional committee, looking into UAP issues, advising them on where they can look.

I think there are still limits on what he can say about things he knew from being on the inside. But he's a solid guy. He had great courage in coming forward and testifying before Congress. He's taken nothing but grief for it. And apparently, based on what we just read in The Wall Street Journal, he's going to be taking some more. I don't think the main target of that was Dave Grush.

I think there are still limits on what he can say about things he knew from being on the inside. But he's a solid guy. He had great courage in coming forward and testifying before Congress. He's taken nothing but grief for it. And apparently, based on what we just read in The Wall Street Journal, he's going to be taking some more. I don't think the main target of that was Dave Grush.

I think there are still limits on what he can say about things he knew from being on the inside. But he's a solid guy. He had great courage in coming forward and testifying before Congress. He's taken nothing but grief for it. And apparently, based on what we just read in The Wall Street Journal, he's going to be taking some more. I don't think the main target of that was Dave Grush.

It was probably meant to discourage other whistleblowers to come forward, but also it was to discourage 60 Minutes from continuing their reporting. 60 Minutes did this piece about drones, the mystery drone story that's been percolating for a couple of years. And that was their real target is to embarrass them. So maybe they don't do additional reporting. Do you agree?

It was probably meant to discourage other whistleblowers to come forward, but also it was to discourage 60 Minutes from continuing their reporting. 60 Minutes did this piece about drones, the mystery drone story that's been percolating for a couple of years. And that was their real target is to embarrass them. So maybe they don't do additional reporting. Do you agree?

It was probably meant to discourage other whistleblowers to come forward, but also it was to discourage 60 Minutes from continuing their reporting. 60 Minutes did this piece about drones, the mystery drone story that's been percolating for a couple of years. And that was their real target is to embarrass them. So maybe they don't do additional reporting. Do you agree?

Because I'm glad they covered it. I'm glad to see 60 Minutes still interested. They did a huge piece a couple of years ago. It got a gigantic reaction from the public. The producer, we know, Graham Messick, he is interested in the subject. He's looking for ways to keep it in the public eye.

Because I'm glad they covered it. I'm glad to see 60 Minutes still interested. They did a huge piece a couple of years ago. It got a gigantic reaction from the public. The producer, we know, Graham Messick, he is interested in the subject. He's looking for ways to keep it in the public eye.

Because I'm glad they covered it. I'm glad to see 60 Minutes still interested. They did a huge piece a couple of years ago. It got a gigantic reaction from the public. The producer, we know, Graham Messick, he is interested in the subject. He's looking for ways to keep it in the public eye.

Bill Whitaker, the correspondent for this piece, was also the correspondent in the previous report they did. I know that going in, he was nervous about what this might do to his career, but he stuck with it. He got a great response.

Bill Whitaker, the correspondent for this piece, was also the correspondent in the previous report they did. I know that going in, he was nervous about what this might do to his career, but he stuck with it. He got a great response.

Bill Whitaker, the correspondent for this piece, was also the correspondent in the previous report they did. I know that going in, he was nervous about what this might do to his career, but he stuck with it. He got a great response.

Obviously, they're not calling drones UFOs, and they're avoiding any implication that the things that were seen over New Jersey, over Langley Air Force Base, over Plant 42 in the Mojave Desert, over the bases in the U.K.,

Obviously, they're not calling drones UFOs, and they're avoiding any implication that the things that were seen over New Jersey, over Langley Air Force Base, over Plant 42 in the Mojave Desert, over the bases in the U.K.,

Obviously, they're not calling drones UFOs, and they're avoiding any implication that the things that were seen over New Jersey, over Langley Air Force Base, over Plant 42 in the Mojave Desert, over the bases in the U.K.,