George Knapp

As we have learned over the years, there's always someone out there who will claim that this video, that photo, this case has been debunked. And all you have to do to debunk it is say it's debunked. I don't think there's any video or image in the history of ufology that someone hasn't said is debunked.

As we have learned over the years, there's always someone out there who will claim that this video, that photo, this case has been debunked. And all you have to do to debunk it is say it's debunked. I don't think there's any video or image in the history of ufology that someone hasn't said is debunked.

As we have learned over the years, there's always someone out there who will claim that this video, that photo, this case has been debunked. And all you have to do to debunk it is say it's debunked. I don't think there's any video or image in the history of ufology that someone hasn't said is debunked.

It's going to be hard to debunk the testimony of these folks, given their credibility and the positions they had over the years. I saw a Wall Street Journal article, you and I have talked about it before, that came out in the last couple of days, which is pretty typical of what mainstream media has done with the UFO topic over the decades.

It's going to be hard to debunk the testimony of these folks, given their credibility and the positions they had over the years. I saw a Wall Street Journal article, you and I have talked about it before, that came out in the last couple of days, which is pretty typical of what mainstream media has done with the UFO topic over the decades.

It's going to be hard to debunk the testimony of these folks, given their credibility and the positions they had over the years. I saw a Wall Street Journal article, you and I have talked about it before, that came out in the last couple of days, which is pretty typical of what mainstream media has done with the UFO topic over the decades.

That is, is to take a dump on it and to discredit it and to muddy the waters. And wow, this was a pretty nasty piece of journalism. Don't you agree? Yeah, yeah.

That is, is to take a dump on it and to discredit it and to muddy the waters. And wow, this was a pretty nasty piece of journalism. Don't you agree? Yeah, yeah.

That is, is to take a dump on it and to discredit it and to muddy the waters. And wow, this was a pretty nasty piece of journalism. Don't you agree? Yeah, yeah.

Yeah, I mean, that was really a low blow. And even for UFO debunkers, that really stands out as a pretty nasty attack because it really doesn't fit. Dave Grush was just announced a couple of days ago. He's going to be working with the congressional committee, looking into UAP issues, advising them on where they can look.

Yeah, I mean, that was really a low blow. And even for UFO debunkers, that really stands out as a pretty nasty attack because it really doesn't fit. Dave Grush was just announced a couple of days ago. He's going to be working with the congressional committee, looking into UAP issues, advising them on where they can look.

Yeah, I mean, that was really a low blow. And even for UFO debunkers, that really stands out as a pretty nasty attack because it really doesn't fit. Dave Grush was just announced a couple of days ago. He's going to be working with the congressional committee, looking into UAP issues, advising them on where they can look.

I think there are still limits on what he can say about things he knew from being on the inside. But he's a solid guy. He had great courage in coming forward and testifying before Congress. He's taken nothing but grief for it. And apparently, based on what we just read in The Wall Street Journal, he's going to be taking some more. I don't think the main target of that was Dave Grush.

I think there are still limits on what he can say about things he knew from being on the inside. But he's a solid guy. He had great courage in coming forward and testifying before Congress. He's taken nothing but grief for it. And apparently, based on what we just read in The Wall Street Journal, he's going to be taking some more. I don't think the main target of that was Dave Grush.

I think there are still limits on what he can say about things he knew from being on the inside. But he's a solid guy. He had great courage in coming forward and testifying before Congress. He's taken nothing but grief for it. And apparently, based on what we just read in The Wall Street Journal, he's going to be taking some more. I don't think the main target of that was Dave Grush.

It was probably meant to discourage other whistleblowers to come forward, but also it was to discourage 60 Minutes from continuing their reporting. 60 Minutes did this piece about drones, the mystery drone story that's been percolating for a couple of years. And that was their real target is to embarrass them. So maybe they don't do additional reporting. Do you agree?

It was probably meant to discourage other whistleblowers to come forward, but also it was to discourage 60 Minutes from continuing their reporting. 60 Minutes did this piece about drones, the mystery drone story that's been percolating for a couple of years. And that was their real target is to embarrass them. So maybe they don't do additional reporting. Do you agree?

It was probably meant to discourage other whistleblowers to come forward, but also it was to discourage 60 Minutes from continuing their reporting. 60 Minutes did this piece about drones, the mystery drone story that's been percolating for a couple of years. And that was their real target is to embarrass them. So maybe they don't do additional reporting. Do you agree?

Because I'm glad they covered it. I'm glad to see 60 Minutes still interested. They did a huge piece a couple of years ago. It got a gigantic reaction from the public. The producer, we know, Graham Messick, he is interested in the subject. He's looking for ways to keep it in the public eye.

Because I'm glad they covered it. I'm glad to see 60 Minutes still interested. They did a huge piece a couple of years ago. It got a gigantic reaction from the public. The producer, we know, Graham Messick, he is interested in the subject. He's looking for ways to keep it in the public eye.