Gerald Posner

So that was the other thing was it was the first time in modern American history that we had an assassination, the other one being King five years later, in which it was done by a rifle shot from a distance. That immediately conjures up the ideas of Day of the Jackal. a professional assassin.

So that was the other thing was it was the first time in modern American history that we had an assassination, the other one being King five years later, in which it was done by a rifle shot from a distance. That immediately conjures up the ideas of Day of the Jackal. a professional assassin.

So that was the other thing was it was the first time in modern American history that we had an assassination, the other one being King five years later, in which it was done by a rifle shot from a distance. That immediately conjures up the ideas of Day of the Jackal. a professional assassin.

We're accustomed to having somebody from the Archduke up through other periods running up with a pistol, shooting the person and gets tackled at the scene. At least you know who the shooter is. Then you have to figure out whether it's a conspiracy or not.

We're accustomed to having somebody from the Archduke up through other periods running up with a pistol, shooting the person and gets tackled at the scene. At least you know who the shooter is. Then you have to figure out whether it's a conspiracy or not.

We're accustomed to having somebody from the Archduke up through other periods running up with a pistol, shooting the person and gets tackled at the scene. At least you know who the shooter is. Then you have to figure out whether it's a conspiracy or not.

So here you have the long range shot, the assassin gets away in the immediate aftermath of the assassination, and then you're off and running as well. So I get that. In addition, people don't believe in blue ribbon panels anymore.

So here you have the long range shot, the assassin gets away in the immediate aftermath of the assassination, and then you're off and running as well. So I get that. In addition, people don't believe in blue ribbon panels anymore.

So here you have the long range shot, the assassin gets away in the immediate aftermath of the assassination, and then you're off and running as well. So I get that. In addition, people don't believe in blue ribbon panels anymore.

They might have had some doubt about it then, but the idea that you're going to have the Warren Commission come out a year later and say, oh, by the way, there's nothing here. So I get why those doubts are there. Then it's fed with false information over a period of time. Things are bad. Facts are repeated that are incorrect.

They might have had some doubt about it then, but the idea that you're going to have the Warren Commission come out a year later and say, oh, by the way, there's nothing here. So I get why those doubts are there. Then it's fed with false information over a period of time. Things are bad. Facts are repeated that are incorrect.

They might have had some doubt about it then, but the idea that you're going to have the Warren Commission come out a year later and say, oh, by the way, there's nothing here. So I get why those doubts are there. Then it's fed with false information over a period of time. Things are bad. Facts are repeated that are incorrect.

You get the House Select Committee in the late 70s, which is a reinvestigation that was great.

You get the House Select Committee in the late 70s, which is a reinvestigation that was great.

You get the House Select Committee in the late 70s, which is a reinvestigation that was great.

they debunked a lot of material but they fell as i call it for two sound acoustic experts experts from new york who came in at the end listened to a dicta belt from a dallas police station and said oh by the way we think there's a 95 certainty there were four shots in that dicta belt not three which would mean a conspiracy by the way if you listen to it you don't hear any sounds you they say there's some supersonic impulses here we think those are bullets

they debunked a lot of material but they fell as i call it for two sound acoustic experts experts from new york who came in at the end listened to a dicta belt from a dallas police station and said oh by the way we think there's a 95 certainty there were four shots in that dicta belt not three which would mean a conspiracy by the way if you listen to it you don't hear any sounds you they say there's some supersonic impulses here we think those are bullets

they debunked a lot of material but they fell as i call it for two sound acoustic experts experts from new york who came in at the end listened to a dicta belt from a dallas police station and said oh by the way we think there's a 95 certainty there were four shots in that dicta belt not three which would mean a conspiracy by the way if you listen to it you don't hear any sounds you they say there's some supersonic impulses here we think those are bullets

Four years later, that was totally debunked by the National Academy of Sciences, but everyone remembers the headline, likelihood of conspiracy versus not. Then Oliver Stone comes in in 91 with his film. I'm amazed that anybody thinks it's Oswald alone in some ways because of all of that. But what you said before is key.

Four years later, that was totally debunked by the National Academy of Sciences, but everyone remembers the headline, likelihood of conspiracy versus not. Then Oliver Stone comes in in 91 with his film. I'm amazed that anybody thinks it's Oswald alone in some ways because of all of that. But what you said before is key.